Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8813853
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 14, 20262026-06-14T03:57:49+00:00 2026-06-14T03:57:49+00:00

does it make sense to use KnockoutJS Viewmodels in combination with ASP.NET MVC3 or

  • 0

does it make sense to use KnockoutJS Viewmodels in combination with ASP.NET MVC3 or 4? Because it is not very DRY, isn’t it? I have to write models for EF, Viewmodels for the MVC Views and Viewmodels for Knockout… and i lose a lot of magic. Automatic client-side validations for example.

Does it make sense to use MVC at all if one sticks with the MVVM Pattern?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-14T03:57:50+00:00Added an answer on June 14, 2026 at 3:57 am

    This may be an unpopular answer, but I don’t use ko.mapping to translate my C# POCOs into JS viewmodels. Two reasons, really.

    The first is a lack of control. ko.mapping will turn everything into an observable if you let it. This can result in a lot of overhead for fields that just don’t need to be observable.

    Second reason is about extensibility. Sure, ko.mapping may translate my C# POCOS into JS objects with observable properties. That’s fine until the point you want a JS method, which at some point, you invariably will.

    In a previous project, I was actually adding extra methods to ko.mapped objects programmatically. At that point, I questioned whether ko.mapping was really creating more problems than it solves.

    I take on board your DRY concerns, but then, I have different domain-focused versions of my POCOs anyway. For example a MyProject.Users.User object served up by a UserController might be very different from a MyProject.Articles.User. The user in the Users namespace might contain a lot of stuff that is related to user administration. The User object in the Articles namespace might just be a simple lookup to indicate the author of an article. I don’t see this approach as a violation of the DRY principle; rather a means of looking at the same concept in two different ways.

    It’s more upfront work, but it means I have problem-specific representations of User that do not pollute each others’ implementations.

    And so it is with Javascript view models. They are not C# POCOs. They’re a specific take on a concept suited to a specific purpose; holding and operating on client side data. While ko.mapping will initially give you what seems to be a productivity boost, I think it is better to hand-craft specific view-models designed for the client.

    btw, I use exactly the same MVC3/KnockoutJS strategy as yourself.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Does it make sense to use .NET DataSets even in applications that use a
Does it make sense to use a combination of MySQL and MongoDB. What im
does it make sense to use an Filecache when using Sqlite as Database ?
Does it make sense to use RIA Services as a service provider to an
When does it make sense to use Loop fission/distribution if I am compiling for
Does it make a sense to use a build server in a small (2-3
Does this make sense? MyValue can be true or false Should it not be
Does it make sense to use a ThreadPool with a poolsize of just 1
I'm really interested how lambda functions are used. Does it make sense to use
Does it make sense to use Qt for increasing the productivity in an MFC

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.