Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6716519
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T08:44:36+00:00 2026-05-26T08:44:36+00:00

does something need to hold a reference to a singleton objective-c object in order

  • 0

does something need to hold a reference to a singleton objective-c object in order to preserve it through the life of an IOS app?

For example if if AppDelegate you created/instantiated a singleton object but didn’t retain it, would this instance (with instance variable data) be available later on in the iPhone app?

In other words to ensure data in the singleton remains intact, in the App Delegate where it was initially created, would the App Delegate need to retain it to one of it’s instance variables?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T08:44:36+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 8:44 am

    No class should need to retain a pointer to a singleton class. Singleton class itself keeps a pointer to its instance. Basically, when the user wants to use a singleton, they will request it through a class method (by convention often starting with shared). This method will check if the singleton has been initialized. If not, it will perform the initialization. If there is already an existing instance in memory, it will just return it. Usually, a singleton object will live in memory for the life of the application.

    The point being that, if you set a value for one of the properties, then, yes, it should be accessible in another part of the program. And no, the app delegate does not need to keep a pointer to the singleton.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I need a offline version of http://developer.apple.com/library/ios/navigation/ Does something like this exist? thank you
This code does not seem to compile, I just need to write something to
Suppose I have written a decorator that does something very generic. For example, it
How does something like System.IO.Compression.GZipStream have anychance of working? Doesn't something like GZip need
I've seen a lot of software that does something similar to what we need
Does something like OpenSSO ( https://opensso.dev.java.net/ ) or ESOE ( http://esoeproject.org/ ) exist for
Does something like this affect performance badly? var myQuery = from c in Customers
Does something like the python if a in [a, b, c]: pass exist in
Does something like this make any sense at all in Java? class A<T extends
Use case: A does something on his box and gots stuck. He asks B

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.