Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4591826
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 21, 20262026-05-21T22:27:05+00:00 2026-05-21T22:27:05+00:00

Does the C++ compiler treat the arrays same way as in C? E.g In

  • 0

Does the C++ compiler treat the arrays same way as in C?

E.g

In C,

  • An array access using subscript
    operator is always interpreted as a
    pointer.
  • In function argument, array declarations
    are treated as pointer to
    start of element.
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-21T22:27:06+00:00Added an answer on May 21, 2026 at 10:27 pm

    Yes and no. Arrays work the same in both languages for the most part (C99 supports variable-length arrays, while C++ doesn’t, and there may be a few other subtle differnces as well).

    However, what you’re saying isn’t exactly true either. The compiler doesn’t treat an array access as a pointer, not even in C. An array access can be more efficient in some cases, because the compiler has better information on aliasing available in the array case. In both C and C++, a plain pointer access means that the compiler has to assume that it may alias any other compatible type. If the compiler simply treated it as a pointer dereference, then this optimization opportunity would be lost.

    Edit
    As pointed out in a comment, the language standard does define array subscripting in terms of pointer arithmetics/dereferencing. Of course, actual compilers make use of the additional information that a pointer is really an array, so they’re not treated exactly like pointers, but that could be considered an optimization beyond what the standard mandates.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

When externing a function in the cpp file does the compiler treat these differently?
When using plain C in iPhone development, does the compiler place the variables declared
When i invoke a virtual function from a base constructor, the compiler does not
Possible Duplicate: Dynamic array in Stack? How do compilers treat variable length arrays Someone
My question is pretty simple: Does the compiler treat all the methods in a
Does the compiler optimize out any multiplications by 1? That is, consider: int a
The Visual Studio compiler does not seem to warn on signed/unsigned assignments, only on
How does virtual functions work behind the scenes in Inheritance ? Does the compiler
For instance, does the compiler know to translate string s = test + this
I was wondering if there is a possible optimization where the compiler does not

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.