Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8789427
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 13, 20262026-06-13T22:24:09+00:00 2026-06-13T22:24:09+00:00

Does the UNIQUE constraint specified on a column or group of columns affect the

  • 0

Does the UNIQUE constraint specified on a column or group of columns affect the write performance of Postgres DB in any way? How does it internally function?

I mean, does it perform unique checking at the time of insertion of a new record? If yes, how does it do that, does it do a linear search for a duplicate value already existing in the DB? In that case, it is deemed to affect the performance i.e. more the number of unique constraints worse would be the write/insert performance? Is it true?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-13T22:24:10+00:00Added an answer on June 13, 2026 at 10:24 pm

    The creation of a UNIQUE constraint or a PRIMARY KEY results in the creation of a UNIQUE btree index. This index must be updated whenever any record is INSERTed, UPDATEed, or DELETEd if any indexed column is changed. If no indexed columns are changed then HOT (heap-only tuple optimisation) may kick in and avoid the index update, especially if you have a non-default FILLFACTOR to make space in pages.

    The index update on insert/update takes time, so inserting into a UNIQUE indexed table is slower than inserting into one without any unique index or primary key. The same is true for UPDATE, but if the index is used to find the tuple to update (and avoid a seqscan) it’s usually a net win vs not having the index at all. If a different index is used to find the tuple, or if a seqscan is faster (as is true on small tables) then just like an INSERT the index has no benefit and just incurs a write cost to update it for that operation. This is true for all indexes, not just UNIQUE indexes.

    Each INSERT or UPDATE on a UNIQUE indexed column requires an index lookup to verify that the key doesn’t conflict with an existing key. From vague memory this is combined with the process of inserting the new entry into the index, but I’m not 100% sure there.

    AFAIK DELETE doesn’t affect the index. It just sets the xmax for the tuple in the heap.

    The index gets updated even if you ROLLBACK the transaction or the transaction aborts with an error after the successful insertion or update on the UNIQUE constrained column. VACUUM work by autovacuum cleans the dead index entries up later. See Concurrency Control in the PostgreSQL manual.

    All this is also true of a PRIMARY KEY, which is also implemented using a UNIQUE index.

    Every index, including the indexes used by PRIMARY KEY and UNIQUE constraints, incurs a penalty on write performance.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Does COUNT(*) have any significant impact for MySQL performance if query already has GROUP
In SQL Server 2005+ (I use both), does adding the UNIQUE constraint to a
Does each column of a table in SQL Server have a unique id? I've
I have created the following entity bean, and specified two columns as being unique.
Is a unique constraint an index by default? If not, does a unique constraint
Consider this unique constraint: ALTER TABLE Posts ADD CONSTRAINT UQ_Posts_Name UNIQUE (Name); Does it
I have a table which doesnot have any unique key column and I want
Does a call of unique() on a list also resize the list if repeats
Why does the MySQL query below give error 1066 (Not unique table/alias: 'customer') ?
Does anyone know if there is a way to generate different code in the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.