Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8844219
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 14, 20262026-06-14T11:25:53+00:00 2026-06-14T11:25:53+00:00

Does there exist a standard pattern for yield returning all the items within an

  • 0

Does there exist a standard pattern for yield returning all the items within an Enumerable?

More often than I like I find some of my code reflecting the following pattern:

    public IEnumerable<object> YieldReturningFunction()
    {

        ...
        [logic and various standard yield return]
        ...

        foreach(object obj in methodReturningEnumerable(x,y,z))
        {
            yield return obj;
        }

    }

The explicit usage of a foreach loop solely to return the results of an Enumerable reeks of code smell to me.

Obviously I could abandon the use of yield return increasing the complexity of my code by explicitly building an Enumerable and adding the result of each standard yield return to it as well as adding a the range of the results of the methodReturningEnumerable. This would be unfortunate, as such I was hoping there exists a better way to manage the yield return pattern.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-14T11:25:54+00:00Added an answer on June 14, 2026 at 11:25 am

    No, there is no way around that.

    It’s a feature that’s been requested, and it’s not a bad idea (a yield foreach or equivalent exists in other languages).

    At this point Microsoft simply hasn’t allocated the time and money to implement it. They may or may not implement it in the future; I would guess (with no factual basis) that it’s somewhere on the to do list; it’s simply a question of if/when it gets high enough on that list to actually get implemented.

    The only possible change that I could see would be to refactor out all of the individual yield returns from the top of the method into their own enumerable returning method, and then add a new method that returns the concatenation of that method and methodReturningEnumerable(x,y,z). Would it be better; no, probably not. The Concat would add back in just as much as you would have saved, if not more.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

This is a curiosity more than anything: Does there exist a programming language that
Does there exist a utf8 code for x(4), functional for cross browser/os. According to
Does there exist a free Windows software program that will help you generate regular
for ($rank=0; $rank<100; $rank++) { printf(Your rank: %d%s, $rank, $suffix); } Does there exist
I need to check if I Filesystem exists, and if it does exist there
There are always the log showing: file does not exist c:/wamp/www/favicon.ico in apache error_log.
There is the same question listed under The key 'UserID' does not exist in
Why does ZeroMemory() , and similar calls exist in the Windows API when there
does there exist a universal database backup/extract format? I'll explain where I'm coming from:
Does there is a way to run my AsyncTask after it finish ? My

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.