Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6940113
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T12:42:40+00:00 2026-05-27T12:42:40+00:00

Does there exist a way to backtrack a namespace in C++ without using ::fully::qualified::namespace::name

  • 0

Does there exist a way to backtrack a namespace in C++ without using ::fully::qualified::namespace::name form?

Given:

namespace f {
    void p() { }
    namespace g {
        void p() {
           [..]::p();
        }
    }
}

Is there a correct form of the [..], apart from fully-qualifying it (i.e. ::f::p())?
The goal is to not use p(), because infinite recursion is not the goal here, while also not using FQ in order to save space.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T12:42:41+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 12:42 pm

    Name lookup works from inner scopes outwards so you don’t need to go from the top down each time. Omitting the leading :: effectively gives you lookup that backtracks until it finds the name that you are looking for so f::p effectively backtracks until it finds an f and then looks for a p inside that f. You don’t need a full ::f::p() although in your case, as f is in the global namespace, there isn’t a huge typing difference.

    Consider this example, where the saving for calling ::f::g::f::p() is more obvious.

    namespace f {
        void p();
        namespace g {
            void p();
            namespace f {
                void p();
                namespace h {
                    void p()
                    {
                        f::p();   // same as ::f::g::f::p()
                        ::f::p(); // fully qualified
                        g::p();   // same as ::f::g::p();
                        p();      // recurse!
                    }
                }
            }
        }
    }
    

    There is no explicit way of forcing lookup to exlcude the immediate scope level (block or namespace, no ..::p() or ^::p() or something.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Does there exist any way in .Net to check before opening if a file
Does there exist a way to catch a write into write-protected page? I plan
Does there exist a way to allocate some memory and have some sort of
Possible Duplicate: Does there exist a static_warning? Is there a way to implement non
Does there exist a website service or set of scripts that will tell you
Does there exist a parser that generates an AST/parse tree at runtime? Kind of
Does there exist a cheat sheet for data structure like TreeMap, SortedMap, HashSet etc
Does there exist a free Windows software program that will help you generate regular
for ($rank=0; $rank<100; $rank++) { printf(Your rank: %d%s, $rank, $suffix); } Does there exist
I need to check if I Filesystem exists, and if it does exist there

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.