Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 200993
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T17:09:37+00:00 2026-05-11T17:09:37+00:00

Don’t you hate it when you have class Foobar { public: Something& getSomething(int index)

  • 0

Don’t you hate it when you have

class Foobar {
public:
    Something& getSomething(int index) {
        // big, non-trivial chunk of code...
        return something;
    }

    const Something& getSomething(int index) const {
        // big, non-trivial chunk of code...
        return something;
    }
}

We can’t implement either of this methods with the other one, because you can’t call the non-const version from the const version (compiler error).
A cast will be required to call the const version from the non-const one.

Is there a real elegant solution to this, if not, what is the closest to one?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T17:09:37+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 5:09 pm

    I recall from one of the Effective C++ books that the way to do it is to implement the non-const version by casting away the const from the other function.

    It’s not particularly pretty, but it is safe. Since the member function calling it is non-const, the object itself is non-const, and casting away the const is allowed.

    class Foo
    {
    public:
        const int& get() const
        {
            //non-trivial work
            return foo;
        }
    
        int& get()
        {
            return const_cast<int&>(const_cast<const Foo*>(this)->get());
        }
    };
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 92k
  • Answers 92k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer With MSDN one of the small things that is good… May 11, 2026 at 6:27 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer mylist.sort(key=lambda d: (d['weight'], d['factor'])) or import operator mylist.sort(key=operator.itemgetter('weight', 'factor')) May 11, 2026 at 6:27 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I'm not sure what you mean when you say "only… May 11, 2026 at 6:27 pm

Related Questions

Is it possible to replace javascript w/ HTML if JavaScript is not enabled on
Don't ask why, but is there any way to suppress a failed linking error?
I don't know when to add to a dataset a tableadapter or a query
I don't edit CSS very often, and almost every time I need to go
I don't understand where the extra bits are coming from in this article about

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.