Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 381263
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T15:04:07+00:00 2026-05-12T15:04:07+00:00

Due to using Gentoo, it often happens that after an update programs are linked

  • 0

Due to using Gentoo, it often happens that after an update programs are linked against old versions of libraries. Normally, revdep-rebuild helps resolving that, but this time it’s a dependency on a python library, and python-updater won’t pick it up.

Is there a “hierarchical” variant of ldd which shows me what shared library depends on which another shared library? Most of the time libraries and executables are linked only against a handful of other shared libraries, which in turn were linked against a handful, turning the library dependency into a big list. I want to know which dependency I’ve got to rebuild with the new version of another library that I upgraded.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T15:04:07+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 3:04 pm

    If you are running Portage≥2.2 with FEATURES=preserve-libs, you should rarely ever need revdep-rebuild anymore as old .so.vers will be preserved as needed (though you still need to rebuild carefully, as stuff still goes kaboom when libA.so.0 wants libC.so.0 and libB.so.0 wants libC.so.1 and some binary wants both libA.so.0 and libB.so.0).


    That being said, what ldd does is to get the dynamic linker to do load the executable or library as it usually would, but print out some info along the way. This is a recursive “binary needs library needs other library&hellip” search, because that’s what the dynamic linker does.

    I’m currently running Linux/ppc32; on Linux/x86, the dynamic linker is usually /lib/ld-linux.so.2, and on Linux/x86_64, the dynamic linker is usually /lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2. Here, I call it directly just to hammer in the point that all ldd is nothing more than a shell script that calls upon the dynamic linker to perform its magic.

    $ /lib/ld.so.1 /sbin/badblocks
    Usage: /sbin/badblocks [-b block_size] [-i input_file] [-o output_file] [-svwnf]
           [-c blocks_at_once] [-d delay_factor_between_reads] [-e max_bad_blocks]
           [-p num_passes] [-t test_pattern [-t test_pattern [...]]]
           device [last_block [first_block]]
    $ LD_TRACE_LOADED_OBJECTS=1 /lib/ld.so.1 /sbin/badblocks
            linux-vdso32.so.1 =>  (0x00100000)
            libext2fs.so.2 => /lib/libext2fs.so.2 (0x0ffa8000)
            libcom_err.so.2 => /lib/libcom_err.so.2 (0x0ff84000)
            libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x0fdfa000)
            libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x0fdc0000)
            /lib/ld.so.1 (0x48000000)
    $ LD_TRACE_LOADED_OBJECTS=1 /lib/ld.so.1 /lib/libcom_err.so.2
            linux-vdso32.so.1 =>  (0x00100000)
            libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x6ffa2000)
            libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x6fe18000)
            /lib/ld.so.1 (0x203ba000)
    $ grep -l pthread /sbin/badblocks /lib/libcom_err.so.2
    /lib/libcom_err.so.2
    

    /sbin/badblocks doesn’t list libpthread.so.0 as a library dependency, but it gets pulled in by libcom_err.so.2.

    Is your problem that ldd doesn’t output a nice-looking dependency tree? Use ldd -v.

    $ LD_TRACE_LOADED_OBJECTS=1 LD_VERBOSE=1 /lib/ld.so.1 /sbin/badblocks
            linux-vdso32.so.1 =>  (0x00100000)
            libext2fs.so.2 => /lib/libext2fs.so.2 (0x0ffa8000)
            libcom_err.so.2 => /lib/libcom_err.so.2 (0x0ff84000)
            libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x0fdfa000)
            libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x0fdc0000)
            /lib/ld.so.1 (0x201f9000)
    
            Version information:
            /sbin/badblocks:
                    libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.2) => /lib/libc.so.6
                    libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.4) => /lib/libc.so.6
                    libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.1) => /lib/libc.so.6
                    libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.0) => /lib/libc.so.6
                    libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.3.4) => /lib/libc.so.6
            /lib/libext2fs.so.2:
                    libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.1.3) => /lib/libc.so.6
                    libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.4) => /lib/libc.so.6
                    libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.3) => /lib/libc.so.6
                    libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.2) => /lib/libc.so.6
                    libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.1) => /lib/libc.so.6
                    libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.0) => /lib/libc.so.6
            /lib/libcom_err.so.2:
                    ld.so.1 (GLIBC_2.3) => /lib/ld.so.1
                    libpthread.so.0 (GLIBC_2.1) => /lib/libpthread.so.0
                    libpthread.so.0 (GLIBC_2.0) => /lib/libpthread.so.0
                    libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.1.3) => /lib/libc.so.6
                    libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.4) => /lib/libc.so.6
                    libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.1) => /lib/libc.so.6
                    libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.0) => /lib/libc.so.6
            /lib/libc.so.6:
                    ld.so.1 (GLIBC_PRIVATE) => /lib/ld.so.1
                    ld.so.1 (GLIBC_2.3) => /lib/ld.so.1
            /lib/libpthread.so.0:
                    ld.so.1 (GLIBC_2.3) => /lib/ld.so.1
                    ld.so.1 (GLIBC_2.1) => /lib/ld.so.1
                    ld.so.1 (GLIBC_PRIVATE) => /lib/ld.so.1
                    libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.1.3) => /lib/libc.so.6
                    libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.3.4) => /lib/libc.so.6
                    libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.4) => /lib/libc.so.6
                    libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.1) => /lib/libc.so.6
                    libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.3.2) => /lib/libc.so.6
                    libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.2) => /lib/libc.so.6
                    libc.so.6 (GLIBC_PRIVATE) => /lib/libc.so.6
                    libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.0) => /lib/libc.so.6
    

    If you want, you can read the ELF headers directly instead of depending on the dynamic linker.

    $ readelf -d /sbin/badblocks | grep NEEDED
     0x00000001 (NEEDED)                     Shared library: [libext2fs.so.2]
     0x00000001 (NEEDED)                     Shared library: [libcom_err.so.2]
     0x00000001 (NEEDED)                     Shared library: [libc.so.6]
    $ readelf -d /lib/libcom_err.so.2 | grep NEEDED
     0x00000001 (NEEDED)                     Shared library: [libpthread.so.0]
     0x00000001 (NEEDED)                     Shared library: [libc.so.6]
     0x00000001 (NEEDED)                     Shared library: [ld.so.1]
    

    You can also man ld.so for other cute tricks you can play with glibc‘s dynamic linker.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 175k
  • Answers 175k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Use some JPA 2 implementation: it adds a @ElementCollection annotation,… May 12, 2026 at 3:04 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You can use the AntCall Task to call a Task… May 12, 2026 at 3:04 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You might want to look the category of "similarity measures"… May 12, 2026 at 3:04 pm

Related Questions

A line in this answer , Get used to using the Mac on its
I typically develop in C# and am quite accustom to using System.IO. I recently
Is there any easy/general way to clean an XML based data source prior to
I've got a pretty stubborn executable that I would like to execute sequentially multiple
Problem: I need to output the TOP X Contributors determined by the amount of

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.