Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7040163
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 28, 20262026-05-28T01:53:07+00:00 2026-05-28T01:53:07+00:00

During bug fixing in very old project I’ve faced with strange method, it looks

  • 0

During bug fixing in very old project I’ve faced with strange method, it looks like this:

   void waiter() {
        for (int i = 0; i < 20000; i++) ;
    }

Does it cause halting some time or it will be omitted by JVM optimization?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-28T01:53:08+00:00Added an answer on May 28, 2026 at 1:53 am

    It will be optimized after few runs by JIT. The JVM , at the first run, needs to check if the value if i that is being incremented is not being used anywhere.

    Check this article as well :

    Java: how much time does an empty loop use?

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

There's a piece of code that looks like this. The problem is that during
EDIT: This was an old bug long since fixed in Scala 2.8 and later
During a refactor of an iOS project, I ran into this bear of a
More of a warning than a question: We resolved a very puzzling bug this
I am trying to work out a bug we've found during our last iteration
I have a very subtle bug that I'm having trouble identifying. Background: We have
i'm getting this weird CSS bug in ie6/7 (but not in ie8 or firefox):
Probably everyone ran into this problem at least once during development: while(/*some condition here
I'm experiencing what seems like an intermittent bug in Chrome. I was wondering if
I am getting a strange heap corruption error during the application close where if

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.