Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
During web searching, I found the following comment : Traditional Lisp debugging practices can still be used.
I don’t know what Bill meant specifically, but IME:
Typically your editor will have a running instance connected to it. You can compile functions immediately to insert them into the running image — since Lisp has its own compiler, you’re just telling the running image to read and compile a small section of text. Or you can run functions directly, to see what they do.
When an exception is thrown (or a condition is signaled, if you’re lucky enough to be in a dialect with conditions), the debugger will show you the stack trace and let you decide how to continue.
The major difference between Lisp and other high-level compiled languages is that in Lisp you’re basically always writing code with the debugger attached.