Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6778803
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T16:18:34+00:00 2026-05-26T16:18:34+00:00

Dynamic arrays are reference counted, and so the memory is freed automatically by the

  • 0

Dynamic arrays are reference counted, and so the memory is freed automatically by the compiler. My question is, when exactly does this automatic freeing occur? Does it happen immediately, or at the end of the containing procedure?

Here is a concrete example

procedure DoStuff;
var data:TBytes;
begin
  data:=GetData; // lets say data now contains 1 Gig of data.
  DoStuffWithData(data);
  // I now want to free up this 1Gig of memory before continuing.
  // Is this call needed, or would the memory be freed in the next line anyway?
  Finalize(data); 

  data:=GetMoreData; // The first array now has no remaining references
  DoStuffWithData(data);
end

Is the call to Finalize() redundant?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T16:18:35+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 4:18 pm

    The call to Finalize isn’t quite redundant. It’s true that the dynamic array’s reference count will be decremented on the next line (therefore destroying the array, probably), but that will only happen after the new dynamic array is allocated. Just before the return of GetMoreData, but before the assignment takes place, there will be two dynamic arrays in memory. If you destroy the first one manually in advance, then you’ll only have one array in memory at a time.

    The second array that you store in data will get destroyed as DoStuff returns (assuming DoStuffWithData doesn’t store a copy of the dynamic-array reference elsewhere, increasing its reference count).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

How would I reference a dynamic local variable? This is easily accomplished with a
Hellow this is my first question in stack. Im creating a dynamic grid of
Accordingly to the Wikipedia article on dynamic arrays , inserting/deleting at the end of
I've just started combining my knowledge of C++ classes and dynamic arrays. I was
I have a function, which is called sometimes with regular, sometimes dynamic arrays. If
One of my students asked me this kind of homework with C++ arrays. It
I know there are a LOT of similar question to this, but I've tried
I'm dealing with dynamic arrays. The function empty_matrix() creates a new array, representing a
Just curious if this is the best practice for initializing a dynamic, multidimensional array
So I have this 2d dynamic array which content I want to free when

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.