Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 949091
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T23:21:00+00:00 2026-05-15T23:21:00+00:00

EDIT 22 March 2011 : This question is no longer that relevant since Youtube

  • 0

EDIT 22 March 2011: This question is no longer that relevant since Youtube now offers HTTPS access: http://apiblog.youtube.com/2011/02/https-support-for-youtube-embeds.html


Our application is run over HTTPS which rarely presents any problems for us. When it comes to youtube however, the fact that they do not present any content over SSL connections is giving us some head ache when trying to embed clips. Mostly because of Internet Explorers famous little warning message:

“Do you want to view only the webpage
content that was delivered securely?
This page contains content that will
not be delivered using a secure HTTPS
… etc”

I’ve tried to solve this in several ways. The most promising one was to use the ProxyPass functionality in Apache to map to YouTube.

Like this:

ProxyPass: /youtube/ http://www.youtube.com
ProxyPassReverse: /youtube/ http://www.youtube.com

This gets rid of the annoying warning. However, the youtube SWF fails to start streaming The SWF i manage to load into the browser simply states : “An error occurred, please try again later”.

Potential solutions are perhaps:

  • Download youtube FLV:s and serve them out of own domain (gah)
  • Use custom FLV-player and stream only FLV:s from youtube over a https proxy?

Update 10 March: I’ve tried to use Googles Youtube API for ActionScript to load a player. It looked promising at first and I was able to load a player through my https:// proxy. However, the SWF that is loaded contains loads of explicit calls to different non-ssl urls to create authentication links for the FLV-stream and for loading different crossdomain policies.

It really seems like we’re not supposed to access flv-streams directly. This makes it very hard to bypass the Internet Explorer warning, short of ripping out the FLV:s from youtube and serving them out of your own domain.

There are solutions out there for downloading youtubes FLV:s. But that is not compliant with the Youtube terms of use and is really not an option for us.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T23:21:00+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 11:21 pm

    You can use swfobject, which is really all youtubin is doing.

    http://code.google.com/p/swfobject/

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Edit: This question was written in 2008, which was like 3 internet ages ago.
Edit: From another question I provided an answer that has links to a lot
EDIT: This question is more about language engineering than C++ itself. I used C++
Lets say this is the time-stamp: 2011-07-06T00:00:35.851-07:00 What does that tell me? This is
EDIT: This was formerly more explicitly titled: - Best solution to stop Kontiki's KHOST.EXE
EDIT: Learned that Webmethods actually uses NLST, not LIST, if that matters Our business
edit #2: Question solved halfways. Look below As a follow-up question, does anyone know
Inspired by this question where there are differing views on SET NOCOUNT... Should we
EDIT #3 : Microsoft has released a 'fix' to this problem which is available
Suppose that I have a date Jan 31 2011 and I want to add

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.