Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 783621
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T20:34:37+00:00 2026-05-14T20:34:37+00:00

EDIT : At first I thought it wasn’t working cross domain at all, now

  • 0

EDIT: At first I thought it wasn’t working cross domain at all, now I realize it only works in IE

I’m using jQuery to call a web service (ASP.NET .axmx), and trying to us jsonp so that I can call it across different sites. Right now it is working ONLY in IE, but not in Firefox, Chrome, Safari. Also, in IE, a dialog pops up warning “This page is accessing information that is not under its control…”
Any ideas?

Here is the code:

$.ajax({
    type: "POST",
    url: "http://test/TestService.asmx/HelloWorld?jsonp=?",
    dataType: "jsonp",
    success: function(data) {
        alert(data.prop1);
    },
    error: function(XMLHttpRequest, textStatus, errorThrown) {
        alert(XMLHttpRequest.status + " " + textStatus + " " + errorThrown);
    }
}); 

And the server code is:

[ScriptService]
public class TestService : System.Web.Services.WebService{
    [WebMethod]
    [ScriptMethod(ResponseFormat = ResponseFormat.Json)]
    public void HelloWorld() {
        string jsoncallback = HttpContext.Current.Request["jsonp"];
        var response = string.Format("{0}({1});", jsoncallback, @"{'prop1' : '" + DateTime.Now.ToString() + "'}");
        HttpContext.Current.Response.Write(response);
    }
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T20:34:38+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 8:34 pm

    Glad it’s working now.

    You’re trying to send the parameter, “jsonp” — that you need to pass for the “padding” part of the json — as a GET parameter, i.e. in the URL string. Which is the right thing to do.

    But because you’ve specified POST, that’s not happening. Effectively, because you’re specifying POST, the server is expecting all the parameters to be in the POSTed data, not in GET variables, so it’s not checking the URL to retrieve the parameter.

    I think it’s possible that jQuery is being quite forgiving/smart about how it’s doing the JSON evaluation, and therefore still working in IE, because (a) if the server doesn’t read the “jsonp” variable, I think it’ll send back "({'prop1' : '<today's date>'})", which is still evaluate-able as JSON, and (b) IE doesn’t have the same restrictions on cross-site scripting (“same origin” policy) as the other browsers. But I’d need to debug it to be sure.

    I’d suggest using FireBug in Firefox to debug what’s going on with this sort of request in the future, but the main take-away is that if you’re sending parameters as part of the URL, use GET, not POST.

    Cheers,

    Matt

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Using jquery how do I focus the first element (edit field, text area, dropdown
I wanted to edit just the first line of a 4 MB file. When
First, what does one call the ghost caption that appears in a text edit
At first I thought something like: var aName=getAllSomethings(); Is very unreadable, and so I'll
Edit: This question was written in 2008, which was like 3 internet ages ago.
Edit: From another question I provided an answer that has links to a lot
EDIT: This was formerly more explicitly titled: - Best solution to stop Kontiki's KHOST.EXE
EDIT: Learned that Webmethods actually uses NLST, not LIST, if that matters Our business
EDIT: This question is more about language engineering than C++ itself. I used C++
EDIT What small things which are too easy to overlook do I need to

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.