Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7002289
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T20:54:33+00:00 2026-05-27T20:54:33+00:00

EDIT FOR CLARITY: I know what the ‘head of empty list’ error is and

  • 0

EDIT FOR CLARITY: I know what the ‘head of empty list’ error is and why it is thrown. What I don’t know is why there is no error when I use ‘elem’ but there is if I use ‘mElem’. That’s the only change I make to cause the error.

If I use the ‘Prelude.elem’ function the program runs but with one small error. I wrote my version of ‘elem’ (mElem) to counter this error. I looked at the source code for ‘elem’ and wrote my function in a similar style. However, the program crashes due to a ‘head of empty list error’ resulting from the function ‘getExisting’

genTupleCount :: [F.Record] -> [(String, Int)] -> [(String, Int)]
genTupleCount [] tuples = tuples
genTupleCount (x:xs) tuples | mElem (F.club x) (map fst tuples) = genTupleCount xs $ getNewTuples tuples existing
                            | otherwise = genTupleCount xs $ (F.club x, 1):tuples
                        where 
                            existing = getExisting x tuples

getExisting :: F.Record -> [(String, Int)] -> (String, Int)                         
getExisting x tuples = head $ filter ((==F.club x).fst) tuples

getNewTuples :: [(String, Int)] -> (String, Int) -> [(String, Int)]
getNewTuples old e = (fst e, 1 + (snd e)):(delete e old)

mElem :: String -> [String] -> Bool
mElem _ [] = False
mElem str (x:xs) = (map toLower str) == (map toLower x) || mElem str xs
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T20:54:34+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 8:54 pm

    As Matt Fenwick said, you’re assuming there is an element that satisfies your condition. I suggest using find instead:

    getExisting :: F.Record -> [(String, Int)] -> Maybe (String, Int)
    getExisting x = find ((==F.club x).fst)
    

    This handles the case of there not being any such element by returning Nothing, and let’s you skip mElem entirely; just check the result of getExisting to find out whether there is any such element, and if there is, what its value is.

    As to why using mElem instead of elem causes your program to crash, it is because it does not verify that there is an element that satisfies the condition getExisting searches for. getExisting doesn’t normalise the capitalisation as mElem does, so if nElem returns True only because of its case-folding, then the call to getExisting will occur, and it will perform head on the empty list, because filter will find no elements matching getExisting‘s stricter condition.

    The find solution avoids this potential for error, since it only has the condition in one place.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I don't know but it may be no sense question to many of you,
[edit: added command outputs as requested, and reorganized for clarity] I've got two clones
I want to know if there is a built-in BASH command that prints some
( Edit : to clarify, my main goal is concurrency, but not necessarily for
I have this funny issue. I know this error message is found in a
I know you can't have multiple instances in the same process, but is it
Edit: I solved my problem but if you have anything to add please do.
First, yes I know about this question , but I'm looking for a bit
I hope this hasn't been asked before, if so I apologize. EDIT: For clarity,
I'm trying to use use the LoadInk method of an mathinputcontrol but I can't

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.