Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8045499
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 5, 20262026-06-05T05:33:59+00:00 2026-06-05T05:33:59+00:00

EDIT : Juan Mendez’s solution fixed this particular problem, but does not explain the

  • 0

EDIT: Juan Mendez’s solution fixed this particular problem, but does not explain the more general question of why this worked on 32 bit and not 64 bit for the exact same browser. Just makes me wonder what other issues like this might exist and how to take preventative action against them… Here is the original question:


I have IE 9 installed on two Windows 7 machines, one 32 bit and the other 64. All of the IE options / security settings are identical.

On the 32 bit machine, the following website displays correctly. Notice the scrolling social media icons about midway down the page are in motion, scrolling to the left:

http://www.nba.com/warriors/social-media-new-test

On the 64 bit machine, the script doesn’t seem to be running as the icons do not move. Other scripts on the page are running fine (for instance the header has some javascript controlling which image to display).

Here is the code which makes the icons move, however I fear this is a larger (less specific) problem:

$(document).ready(function() {
    setInterval(scrollIcons, 40);
});

function scrollIcons() {
    var i, thisPos, newPosLeft;

    for (i=0; i < numIcons; i++) {
        thisPos = $(iconButtons[i]).position();

        newPosLeft = thisPos.left - (1 * scrollspeed);
        if (newPosLeft < SLIDERLEFTBORDER) newPosLeft = SLIDERRIGHTBORDER;

        $(iconButtons[i]).attr("style", "left: " + newPosLeft + "px;");
    }
}

Anyone know what the issue could be? Am I wrong about the 64 bit vs. 32 bit assumption? That just seems to be the only difference between the machines to me.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-05T05:34:01+00:00Added an answer on June 5, 2026 at 5:34 am

    When I run your page on IE 8 64-bit, I get the following error:

    // Object doesn't support this property or method
    divs = document.getElementsByClassName('icon_socialmedia');
    

    Use jQuery instead since you’re already using in other places

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Edit: This question looks like it might be the same problem, but has no
EDIT: This was formerly more explicitly titled: - Best solution to stop Kontiki's KHOST.EXE
Edit: I think I figured out the solution, but I'm still interested to know
Edit: I'm looking for solution for this question now also with other programming languages.
EDIT Leaving this for posterity, but nearly a year later, to get down voted,
EDIT : Summary : Git does not allow dates before 1973/03/03 09:46:40 (epoch+100000000s) given
EDIT: This question is more about language engineering than C++ itself. I used C++
@edit: fixed everything and decoded the view state and this is what I got
EDIT - I was able to fix this problem using code from 'Farray' with
EDIT: Problem solved... and unrelated to the phrasing of the question... sorry for the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.