Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 107503
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T01:45:51+00:00 2026-05-11T01:45:51+00:00

EDIT: Oops – as rightly pointed out, there’d be no way to know whether

  • 0

EDIT: Oops – as rightly pointed out, there’d be no way to know whether the constructor for the class in question is sensitive to when or how many times it is called, or whether the object’s state is changed during the method, so it would have to be created from scratch each time. Ignore the Dictionary and just consider delegates created in-line during the course of a method 🙂


Say I have the following method with Dictionary of Type to Action local variable.

void TakeAction(Type type) {     // Random types chosen for example.     var actions = new Dictionary<Type, Action>()     {         {typeof(StringBuilder), () =>             {                 // ..             }},          {typeof(DateTime), () =>             {                 // ..             }}     };      actions[type].Invoke(); } 

The Dictionary will always be the same when the method is called. Can the C# compiler notice this, only create it once and cache it somewhere for use in future calls to the method? Or will it simply be created from scratch each time? I know it could be a field of the containing class, but it seems neater to me for a thing like this to be contained in the method that uses it.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T01:45:52+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 1:45 am

    How should the C# compiler know that it’s ‘the same’ dictionary every time? You explicitly create a new dictionary every time. C# does not support static local variables, so you have to use a field. There’s nothing wrong with that, even if no other method uses the field.

    It would be bad if the C# compiler did things like that. What if the constructor of the variable uses random input? 🙂

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

edit #2: Question solved halfways. Look below As a follow-up question, does anyone know
Edit: This question was written in 2008, which was like 3 internet ages ago.
Edit: From another question I provided an answer that has links to a lot
EDIT: This question is more about language engineering than C++ itself. I used C++
Edit : Solved, there was a trigger with a loop on the table (read
Edit: OOPS, apparently in my test tables, I forgot to set id as autoincremental.
EDIT: This was formerly more explicitly titled: - Best solution to stop Kontiki's KHOST.EXE
EDIT: Learned that Webmethods actually uses NLST, not LIST, if that matters Our business
EDIT What small things which are too easy to overlook do I need to
Edit: This was accidentally posted twice. Original: VB.NET Importing Classes I've seen some code

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.