Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6824219
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T21:52:33+00:00 2026-05-26T21:52:33+00:00

EDIT seems my original post below might have been a bit long. Simply said,

  • 0

EDIT seems my original post below might have been a bit long.

Simply said, can I spawn some AppDomains and ensure that they cannot communicate with one another in any way?


There is a competitive robotic soccer simulation league called RoboCup 3D. One of the fundamental rules is that all communication between agents be conducted through the central server. This server enforces the rules of the simulation, such as limiting distances and rates of message passing across the field.

Teams comprise several agents. The rules state that each agent must run in its own process. The rationale being that inter-process communication can be detected.

I’ve authored a .NET library for RoboCup called TinMan. There is some talk on the relevant mailing lists of teams being entered that are written in .NET for the first time next year. As an aside, they will run on Mono.

In a managed environment like the CLR, I believe there would be performance benefits to running all agents in a single instance of the CLR, primarily due to running a single GC. I’ve asked the question whether it might be acceptable to use separate AppDomains of the same process if this is the case.

What I’d like to know if whether it’s possible to detect (and even prevent) communication between AppDomains. If so, then there’s more chance that RoboCup teams written in .NET could run their teams in a single process.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T21:52:33+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 9:52 pm

    AFAIK, no. AppDomains are managed by the CLR; you cannot intercept inter-AppDomain communication in order to prevent it (what AppDomain would this code run in, for example?)

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Author post-edit: Chosen solution (Original question remains below this box) SUMMARY: You SHOULD NOT
I have been through pretty much every post on this site it seems that
EDIT: Corrected the site header IE7 code in my original post. Have tried that
This seems like such a simple question. I have several Edit boxes on my
PLEASE SEE THE EDIT BELOW, THE REPORT SEEMS TO USE CACHED DATA? I cant
EDIT: A working regex (take the second group): (^|[ ,\t\n]+)([0-9\\.]+)($|[ ,\t\n]+) Original post: I'm
Original question has been answered. Update addresses related question raised in comments. Original post:
Edit: It seems my test to determine whether the original JVM had exited was
EDIT 3: I am maintaining the original question below for historical reasons. However, I
EDIT: After feedback from my original post, I've change the text to clarify my

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.