Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6838067
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T23:33:08+00:00 2026-05-26T23:33:08+00:00

EDIT: This bug was logged, and confirmed as a Facebook bug . It has

  • 0

EDIT: This bug was logged, and confirmed as a Facebook bug. It has now been fixed!



I am testing my updates to move onto the new JS SDK. My app runs across multiple subdomains of my domain. On the old JDK, I was calling something like this:

FB.init({
    appId: [APP_ID],
    status: false,
    cookie: true,
    xfbml: true
});
FB.login();

On the new JDK, it looks like this:

FB.init({
    appId: [APP_ID],
    status: false,
    cookie: true,
    xfbml: true,
    oauth:true
});
FB.login();

Using a cookie manager FF add on, you can see that the old version would set a cookie on mydomain.com, but the new one sets it to http://www.mydomain.com – meaning my other subdomain cannot access the cookie.

To clarify: The problem is that I cannot use the facebook cookie on different subdomains, and also if I log them in on every subdomain, I have to log them out from every subdomain too

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T23:33:08+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 11:33 pm

    Update: The bug has been updated by Facebook to ‘Fixed’. Hooray!

    This is a facebook bug and has been logged, reproduced and accepted as high priority here: https://developers.facebook.com/bugs/256155664428653?browse=search_4e843e6d89a232275456793

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

EDIT : As of 2012-06-11 this bug has been finally fixed! https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35981#c1 I have
Edit : The bug that caused this problem has been fixed. The @version tag
Edit: This is a confirmed bug in jQuery 1.3.1. It is fixed in jQuery
EDIT : This issue has been fixed by google in gtest 1.4.0; see the
EDIT: This was an old bug long since fixed in Scala 2.8 and later
EDIT: This was just confirmed as a bug in Doctrine 2 http://www.doctrine-project.org/jira/browse/DDC-1112?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15724#action_15724 I have
Edit: This code is fine. I found a logic bug somewhere that doesn't exist
(EDIT: This question is now outdated for my particular issue, as Google Code supports
Edit: This is indeed a bug in the compiler, I've opened a defect and
Possible Duplicate: “Least Astonishment” in Python: The Mutable Default Argument Edit: This has nothing

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.