Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 552897
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T11:32:54+00:00 2026-05-13T11:32:54+00:00

(edited from original post to change BaseMessage to const BaseMessage&) Hello All, I’m very

  • 0

(edited from original post to change “BaseMessage” to “const BaseMessage&”)

Hello All,
I’m very new to C++, so I hope you folks can help me “see the errors of my ways”.

I have a hierarchy of messages, and I’m trying to use an abstract base class to enforce
an interface. In particular, I want to force each derived message to provide an overloaded
<< operator.

When I try doing this with something like this:

class BaseMessage
{
public:

// some non-pure virtual function declarations
// some pure virtual function declarations

virtual ostream& operator<<(ostream& stream, const BaseMessage& objectArg) = 0;

}

the compiler complains that

“error: cannot declare parameter ‘objectArg’ to be of abstract type ‘BaseMessage’

I believe there are also “friend” issues involved here, but when I tried to declare it as:

virtual friend ostream& operator<<(ostream& stream, const BaseMessage objectArg) = 0;

the compiler added an addition error

“error: virtual functions cannot be friends”

Is there a way to ensure that all of my derived (message) classes provide an “<<” ostream operator?

Thanks Much,

Steve

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T11:32:54+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 11:32 am

    The common convention for this is to have a friend output operator at the base level and have it call private virtual function:

    class Base
    {
    public:
    
        /// don't forget this
        virtual ~Base();
    
        /// std stream interface
        friend std::ostream& operator<<( std::ostream& out, const Base& b )
        {
            b.Print( out );
            return out;
        }
    
    private:
    
        /// derivation interface
        virtual void Print( std::ostream& ) const =0;
    };
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I edited an already-made example from the RXTX website. I am new in Java
I edited epoc.ini added textshell in the first line. When I run from the
edited, this is it function handleDate( timestamp ) { var n=new Date(), t, ago
I edited my original text to demostrate my entire set of code for those
Update: Edited code example to use AutoA for the workaround (which was the original
I have edited the original question since the same error is occurring the difference
In response to the helpful comments, I have edited the original question (where I
I have to submit all telephone numbers from my database records to URL, but
[EDITED: I left the original question below, with some more context and code to
Edited Original question was about trouble with reconnecting (close() and shutdown() confusion). The below

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.