Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7661529
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 31, 20262026-05-31T13:36:37+00:00 2026-05-31T13:36:37+00:00

Edited to add: Drat it! I didn’t have the latest version of the code.

  • 0

Edited to add: Drat it! I didn’t have the latest version of the code. It was a bug and he fixed it. Please join me in voting to close.

I’m looking at somebody else’s Python code that says:

bar = [].append(foo)

I believe this is an overly complicated way of saying the same as :

bar = [foo]

I wondered if he was simply ignorant of the Python syntax, but generally his Python code seems quite competent and in another place in the code, he has written:

qux(param=[foo])

So, that doesn’t explain it.

Am I missing something? Is this a useful idiom I am not aware of? (e.g. it is more performant, works on older versions of Python, etc.)

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-31T13:36:38+00:00Added an answer on May 31, 2026 at 1:36 pm

    No, it is an overly complicated way of saying bar = None. List methods operate in-place, and hence return None.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Edited to Add * I haven't found a solution for this one yet, can
--edited for clarity (hopefully) I have an XML file that looks something like this:
I have the following code that adds a file upload option to a div
I have a fixed-height (180px) header and fixed-height footer (50px). I'd like the container
Edited to add more details: (originally asked nearly two months ago...still haven't found a
(Edited to add an example and hopefully make it a bit clearer) I'm mainly
I have this piece of code to make an asynchronous HTTP request: public static
NOTE: Edited to add the Model The Problem: a querystring guid value is giving
// edited by Neil Butterworth to conserve vertical space #include <stdio.h> struct A; struct
Edited Question: This should be clear. using System; namespace UpdateDateTimeFields { class Program {

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.