Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7816011
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 2, 20262026-06-02T05:42:48+00:00 2026-06-02T05:42:48+00:00

element* elements = new element[size.x]; This will build X elements with the default constructor.

  • 0
element* elements = new element[size.x];

This will build X elements with the default constructor. During my program, I would like to construct each element with different constructor parameters, like this:

for(int i=0; i < size.x; ++i) 
    elements[i]  = element(i);

Is there any way to prevent and needless default instanciation (that I don’t want to implement) and a needless calle to Operator= ?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-02T05:42:49+00:00Added an answer on June 2, 2026 at 5:42 am

    if it doesn’t hurt your design you can use a double pointer to achieve this

    element ** elements = new element * [size.x];
    
    for(int i=0; i < size.x; ++i) 
        elements[i]  = new element(i);
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

is it possible to insert a new element to std::set like in case of
I really like the visual effect where a new element seems to push an
I am trying to create a new Element in my javascript code and append
I want to create a new element with html5 data attributes defined, however they
How can I bind a new element create after the page has loaded? I
I have a form that when submitted successfully generates new elements on the page
var cityList = from country in doc.Element(result) .Element(cities) .Descendants(city) select new { Name =
Ruby 1.9 has a few new syntax elements, such as the {key: value} hash
I have a script that create a new div element. Then, I want to
I've figured out how to assign a rotation value (element.RenderTransform = new RotateTransform(x)), but

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.