Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6863083
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T02:44:21+00:00 2026-05-27T02:44:21+00:00

Every time I read about using synchronized in Scala the author will usually mention

  • 0

Every time I read about using synchronized in Scala the author will usually mention that Actors should be used instead (this for example). While I understand roughly how actors work I’d really like to see an example of Actors being used to replace Java’s synchronized method modifier (by this I mean its Scala equivalent – the synchronized block) in a piece of code. Modifying the internals of a data structure for instance would be nice to see.

Is this a good use of Actors or have I been misinformed?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T02:44:22+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 2:44 am

    Actors guarantee that only a single message will be handles at time so that there will not be two threads accessing any of the instance members – ergo no need to use synchronized

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I just read about the LLVM project and that it could be used to
Duplicate: What is aspect-oriented programming? Every time I here a podcast or read a
Every time I create an object that has a collection property I go back
Every time I try to run a small application that uses a Derby DB
Most of the information that I found and read about properly storing passwords in
I am developing a windows based application using C#. This should be used by
I have read through about every possible solution online, and I get a different
I am tired of using them, Every time I think now I know these
I am using ExtJS version 3.0.0 and I really don't know why every time
I've read several tutorials, documentations about mysql, db structures and also I'm using it

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.