Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1053131
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T17:12:18+00:00 2026-05-16T17:12:18+00:00

Examine the following scenario. There is a table with two columns – DateWithoutMilliseconds and

  • 0

Examine the following scenario. There is a table with two columns – DateWithoutMilliseconds and Milliseconds. Together these two columns define the exact timestamp with the milliseconds.

Is it possible to write a single SQL statement (not using stored procedures) which would fetch the row with the minimum timestamp with the milliseconds precision? Actually, just the timestamp is good enough, but it has to be with the milliseconds, because several rows may have the same DateWithoutMilliseconds value, but differ in milliseconds.

Now, I am complete with the idea of storing the total milliseconds in the database instead of the aforementioned two columns. However, I must be sure that I am not missing anything and if there is an SQL that allows to have two columns and still be able to fetch the exact minimum – I want to know it.

Thanks a lot in advance to all the good samaritans out there.

EDIT

We use both SqlServer and MySql.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T17:12:19+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 5:12 pm

    It will probably look different for different databases, but in SQL Server you should be able to do something like this:

    SELECT TOP 1 
        Field1, Field2, 
        dateadd(ms, MillisecondsField, DateWithoutMillisecondsField) TimeStamp
    FROM Table
    ORDER BY TimeStamp DESC
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.