Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 607381
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T17:21:14+00:00 2026-05-13T17:21:14+00:00

F# allows to use checked arithmetics by opening Checked module, which redefines standard operators

  • 0

F# allows to use checked arithmetics by opening Checked module, which redefines standard operators to be checked operators, for example:

open Checked
let x = 1 + System.Int32.MaxValue // overflow

will result arithmetic overflow exception.

But what if I want to use checked arithmetics in some small scope, like C# allows with keyword checked:

int x = 1 + int.MaxValue;             // ok
int y = checked { 1 + int.MaxValue }; // overflow

How can I control the scope of operators redefinition by opening Checked module or make it smaller as possible?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T17:21:14+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 5:21 pm

    You can always define a separate operator, or use shadowing, or use parens to create an inner scope for temporary shadowing:

    let f() =
        // define a separate operator
        let (+.) x y = Checked.(+) x y
        try 
            let x = 1 +. System.Int32.MaxValue
            printfn "ran ok"
        with e ->
            printfn "exception"
        try 
            let x = 1 + System.Int32.MaxValue
            printfn "ran ok"
        with e ->
            printfn "exception"
        // shadow (+)
        let (+) x y = Checked.(+) x y
        try 
            let x = 1 + System.Int32.MaxValue
            printfn "ran ok"
        with e ->
            printfn "exception"
        // shadow it back again
        let (+) x y = Operators.(+) x y
        try 
            let x = 1 + System.Int32.MaxValue
            printfn "ran ok"
        with e ->
            printfn "exception"
        // use parens to create a scope
        (
            // shadow inside
            let (+) x y = Checked.(+) x y
            try 
                let x = 1 + System.Int32.MaxValue
                printfn "ran ok"
            with e ->
                printfn "exception"
        )            
        // shadowing scope expires
        try 
            let x = 1 + System.Int32.MaxValue
            printfn "ran ok"
        with e ->
            printfn "exception"
    
    
    f()    
    // output:
    // exception
    // ran ok
    // exception
    // ran ok
    // exception
    // ran ok
    

    Finally, see also the --checked+ compiler option:

    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd233171(VS.100).aspx

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 382k
  • Answers 382k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I think it's laziness/carelessness. GetName() should have no effect on… May 14, 2026 at 10:31 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer "Plain" Propel doesn't do this, but if you use it… May 14, 2026 at 10:31 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer How about having two common classes "Highlight" and "Normal". <style>… May 14, 2026 at 10:31 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.