Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7065019
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 28, 20262026-05-28T04:54:19+00:00 2026-05-28T04:54:19+00:00

First, malloc a buffer from userspace and fill the buffer with all ‘A’ Then,

  • 0

First, malloc a buffer from userspace and fill the buffer with all ‘A’
Then, pass the pointer of the buffer to kernel ,using netlink socket,
Finally, I can read and write the buffer, using the raw pointer directly passed from userspace.
Why ?
Why directly access to user space memory from kernel is allowed?
Linux Device Driver, Third Edition, Page 415, said that The kernel cannot directly manipulate memory that is not mapped into the kernel’s address space.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-28T04:54:20+00:00Added an answer on May 28, 2026 at 4:54 am

    The point is that accessing user addresses directly in kernel only sometimes work.

    As long as you try to access the user address in the context of the same process that allocated it and that the process has already faulted it in and you are using a kernel with a 3:1 memory mapping (as opposed to 4:4 mapping that is sometimes used) and that the kernel did not swap out the page the allocation is in – the access will work.

    The problem is that all these conditions are not always true and they can change even from run time of the program to another. Therefore the kernel driver writers needs to not count on being able to access user addresses.

    The worst thing that can happen is for you to assume it works, have it always work in the lab, and have it crash at a customer site every so often. This is the reason for the book statement.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

This is my first time using splint (from Ubuntu repositories) and I immediately got
I'm getting a segmentation fault the first time I call malloc() after I protect
First, let's get the security considerations out of the way. I'm using simple authentication
First off, I am using Windows XP. I have multiple hard drives and it
First of all, I know how to build a Java application. But I have
First off: I'm using a rather obscure implementation of javascript embedded as a scripting
First of all, some background: I'm trying to get in a list of integers
Previously, I'd just dealt with these types of __out function parameters using malloc, but
When you call C's malloc , is there any guarantee about what the first
Hello I use malloc() to generate a buffer like this where buffer is a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.