Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 596513
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T16:10:47+00:00 2026-05-13T16:10:47+00:00

First of all, I am using PhpMyAdmin , is this okay or not? Because

  • 0

First of all, I am using PhpMyAdmin, is this okay or not?
Because when I have cache disabled, and do two queries after eachother, the second query always is faster, so I am thinking maybe there is an internal cache on PhpMyAdmin?

Secondly, is there any way to get the time of how long a query takes, into php, and echo it onto the browser? (so I can use php instead of phpMyAdmin)

Thirdly, SHOW STATUS LIKE '%qcache%' gives me this:

Qcache_free_blocks       1
Qcache_free_memory       25154096
Qcache_hits              0
Qcache_inserts       2
Qcache_lowmem_prunes     0
Qcache_not_cached        62
Qcache_queries_in_cache  2
Qcache_total_blocks      6

How come Qcache_not_cached grows by a number of 5 or 10 for every query I make? Shouldn’t there only be 1 increase per query?

Also, when I enabled the cache, and did a query, the Qcache_queries_in_cache got increased by 2… I thought it would be increased by 1 per every query, explain someone?

THEN, when I did another query the same as the one I cached, there was no performance gain at all, the query took as long as without the cache enabled…

Any help here please except for referring to the manual (I have read it already).

Thanks

UPDATE

Here is a typical query I make:

   SELECT * FROM `langlinks` WHERE ll_title='Africa'
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T16:10:47+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 4:10 pm

    First of all, I am using PhpMyAdmin,
    is this okay or not?

    I suppose it’s better than nothing — and more user-friendly than a command-line client ; but a thing I don’t like with phpMyAdmin is that it sends queries you didn’t write.

    I’ve already seen phpMyAdmin send some queries that were “hurting” a server, while the one that had been written by the user was OK, for instance (I don’t have the exact example in mind).

    Generally speaking, though, I’d say it’s “ok” as long as you accept that more requests will be sent : phpMyAdmin displays lots of informations (like the list of databases, tables, and so on), and has to get those informations from somewehre !

    Shouldn’t there only be 1 increase per
    query?

    If you really want to see the impact of your query and no other, you’d probably better use the command-line mysql client, instead of phpMyAdmin : that graphical tool has to send queries to get the informations it displays.

    The question, actually, is : do you prefer a user-friendly tool ? Or do you want to monitor only what your query actually does ?

    In most cases, the answer is “user-friendly tool” — and that’s why phpMyAdmin has so much success 😉

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

First of all (in case this is important) I'm using ActiveState's Perl (v5.8.7 built
First of all: I am not an experienced ClearCase user, but I have lots
First of all there is a partial question regarding this, but it is not
First of all, am I the only person using JSONML? And second of all,
Using jQuery, how do I delete all rows in a table except the first?
First of all, I know how to build a Java application. But I have
First of all, let me say I am very new to rails, have been
First of all, I don't need a textual comparison so Beyond Compare doesn't do
First of all, I'm fairly sure snapping to grid is fairly easy, however I've
First of all, let's define a few tables: Users table will store information about

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.