Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6047925
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T07:24:21+00:00 2026-05-23T07:24:21+00:00

First things first, I’m cheap! :) I can’t afford to buy a static IP

  • 0

First things first, I’m cheap! 🙂 I can’t afford to buy a static IP for my domain and I can’t afford those fancy certificates… So no SSL/HTTPS for me.

What I’m trying to accomplish here is to roll-out my own “HTTP encryption”. Here’s what I have accomplished so far:

  1. Modified an existing proxy script (Glype/PHProxy) to “encrypt” (base64 for now) the echo output. (I’m wrapping the entire content in a body element, btw)
  2. Written a GreaseMonkey script to “decrypt” the encrypted output.

The thing works on simple websites. But when I’m loading complex websites (like a browser game), the javascripts are broken (btw, the script can render the game perfectly when I turned off my encryption).

Upon inspection via FireBug, I’ve noticed that the contents of the head element is being placed in the body element. This doesn’t always happen so I suspected that the PHP is throwing malformed output, but I decoded the base64 using an offline tool and the HTML looks okay.

Here’s a sample output from the PHP:

<html><body>PGh0bWw+DQo8aGVhZD4NCjx0aXRsZT5IZWxsbzwvdGl0bGU+DQo8L2hlYWQ+DQo8Ym9keT4NCjxoMT5IZWxsbyBXb3JsZDwvaDE+DQo8L2JvZHk+DQo8L2h0bWw+</body></html>

Here’s the decoded HTML from Firebug (after being processed by the GM script):

<html>
<head>
<title>Hello</title>
</head>
<body>
<h1>Hello World</h1>
</body>
</html>

Here’s my GM script to decode the PHP output:

function utf8_decode (str_data) {
    var tmp_arr = [],
        i = 0,
        ac = 0,
        c1 = 0,
        c2 = 0,
        c3 = 0;

    str_data += '';

    while (i < str_data.length) {
        c1 = str_data.charCodeAt(i);
        if (c1 < 128) {
            tmp_arr[ac++] = String.fromCharCode(c1);
            i++;
        } else if (c1 > 191 && c1 < 224) {
            c2 = str_data.charCodeAt(i + 1);
            tmp_arr[ac++] = String.fromCharCode(((c1 & 31) << 6) | (c2 & 63));
            i += 2;
        } else {
            c2 = str_data.charCodeAt(i + 1);
            c3 = str_data.charCodeAt(i + 2);
            tmp_arr[ac++] = String.fromCharCode(((c1 & 15) << 12) | ((c2 & 63) << 6) | (c3 & 63));
            i += 3;
        }
    }

    return tmp_arr.join('');
}

function base64_decode (data) {
    var b64 = "ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789+/=";
    var o1, o2, o3, h1, h2, h3, h4, bits, i = 0,
        ac = 0,
        dec = "",
        tmp_arr = [];

    if (!data) {
        return data;
    }

    data += '';

    do { // unpack four hexets into three octets using index points in b64
        h1 = b64.indexOf(data.charAt(i++));
        h2 = b64.indexOf(data.charAt(i++));
        h3 = b64.indexOf(data.charAt(i++));
        h4 = b64.indexOf(data.charAt(i++));

        bits = h1 << 18 | h2 << 12 | h3 << 6 | h4;

        o1 = bits >> 16 & 0xff;
        o2 = bits >> 8 & 0xff;
        o3 = bits & 0xff;

        if (h3 == 64) {
            tmp_arr[ac++] = String.fromCharCode(o1);
        } else if (h4 == 64) {
            tmp_arr[ac++] = String.fromCharCode(o1, o2);
        } else {
            tmp_arr[ac++] = String.fromCharCode(o1, o2, o3);
        }
    } while (i < data.length);

    dec = tmp_arr.join('');
    dec = utf8_decode(dec);

    return dec;
}

document.documentElement.innerHTML = base64_decode(document.body.innerHTML);

I think the problem is I’m assigning the decoded HTML to document.documentElement.innerHTML, and by doing so it’s putting the entire thing inside the body element?

So the question is, what is the correct way to recreate a HTML document from a string?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T07:24:21+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 7:24 am

    Since you are just base 64 encoding, and as @Battle_707 has said the issue is with dom events, why don’t you send a page that redirects to a data url. This way the browser should fire all the right events.

    But seriously, just get a certificate and get on dyndns.com, base 64 buys you no extra security

    Edit

    Since you mentioned moving to AES, if you can find a JS AES implementation you could use my suggestion here and construct the data URL client side and redirect to that.

    function openPageFromString(html){
        location="data:text/html,"+encodeURIComponent(html);
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm working on my first 'real' F# assembly, and trying to do things right.
One of the first things I learned in C++ was that #include <iostream> int
One of the first things I like to do when I make a site
One if the first things I learned when I started with C# was the
I've installed PowerShell recently and one of the first things I started looking for
Everything is an object was one of the first things I learned about Ruby,
I know the bits just came out today, but one of the first things
I have an app with a UITextField, amongst other things. When the user first
First things first: I'm using Ruby 1.9.3 and DataMapper 1.2.0. I created the following
First things first. I know how to parse XML/HTML with simplexml, and I know

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.