Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6323621
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T16:33:11+00:00 2026-05-24T16:33:11+00:00

Follow-on to an earlier question: Force SET IDENTITY_INSERT to take effect faster from MS

  • 0

Follow-on to an earlier question: Force SET IDENTITY_INSERT to take effect faster from MS Access

I’m in the process of upsizing from an MS Access backend to a SQL Server backend. Many of the tables have autonumber primary keys. I’m trying to populate them as follows (pseudocode):

ExecutePassThru "SET IDENTITY_INSERT dbo.Accounts ON"
db.Execute "INSERT INTO sql_Accounts SELECT * FROM mdb_Accounts"
ExecutePassThru "SET IDENTITY_INSERT dbo.Accounts OFF"

In the above code, sql_Accounts is a linked table connected to the Accounts table in SQL Server and mdb_Accounts is a linked table connected to the Accounts table in the mdb. This fails with the error,

Cannot insert explicit value for identity column in table ‘Accounts’ when IDENTITY_INSERT is set to OFF.

I fired up SQL Server Profiler to try to figure out the problem and the issue is that each line of code in my sample may or may not use a different Server Process ID (SPID). In other words, they are using different connections to the backend.

Is there some way to ensure they all use the same connection?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T16:33:12+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 4:33 pm

    There may be a more elegant solution, however this a one time conversion and it’s not worth too deep of dive trying to do complex things with connection reuse.

    1. Create a staging table on the SQL Server that does not contain an identity but is otherwise of the same schema.
    2. Load your data to that table
    3. Do your identity insert entirely on the SQL Server side.
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

This is a follow on from an earlier question about how to condense a
As a follow up to an earlier question that attracted a whole zero answers,
This is a follow-up to an earlier question I posted on EF4 entity keys
This is a follow-up question to this question I asked earlier. Btw thanks Neil
Follow up question from Multi-core usage, threads, thread-pools . Are threads moved from one
As a follow up to my earlier question , I'm thinking of using simplexml_load_file
This is somewhat of a follow up to a question posted earlier last month.
This is a follow-up to another question I asked earlier today. I am creating
This is a follow-up to a question I'd asked earlier which phrased this as
(Follow-up to my earlier question, Ruby: how can I copy a variable without pointing

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.