Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 694437
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T02:51:23+00:00 2026-05-14T02:51:23+00:00

Following on from a previous question , I am creating a symbolic link on

  • 0

Following on from a previous question, I am creating a symbolic link on a Server 2008 from a Vista machine using UNC paths. I can create the link just fine. I can go to the Server 2008 box and double click on the link in explorer to open the target file. What I cannot do though is use FileCreateW to get a handle to the UNC path link (from the Vista box). When I try it, it fails and GetLastError() returns error code 1463 (0x5B7), which is:

The symbolic link cannot be followed because its type is disabled.

How to enable its “type” in Server 2008 (assuming the error means what it says)?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T02:51:24+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 2:51 am

    To add to @David Arno’s helpful answer, based on W7:


    fsutil.exe can be made to show what arguments it takes by simply running:

    fsutil behavior set /?
    

    To report the current configuration, run fsutil behavior query SymlinkEvaluation – see @Jake1164’s answer, particularly with respect to how a group policy may be controlling the behavior.

    The symbolic-link resolution behavior is set on the machine that accesses a given link, not the machine that hosts it.

    The behavior codes for fsutil behavior set SymlinkEvaluation – namely L2L, L2R, R2L, and R2R – mean the following:

    • L stands for "Local", and R for "Remote"
    • The FIRST L or R – before the 2 – refers to the location of the link itself (as opposed to its target) relative to the machine ACCESSING the link.
    • The SECOND L or R – after the 2 – refers to the location of the link’s target relative to the machine where the LINK itself is located.

    Thus, for instance, executing fsutil behavior set SymlinkEvaluation R2L means that you can access links:

    • located on a remote machine (R)
    • that point to targets on that same remote machine (L)

    Unlike what David experienced on Vista, I, on W7, was able to resolve a remote link that pointed to a resource on another remote machine by enabling R2R alone (and not also having to enable R2L).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Following on from my previous question [link text][1] , I have a new problem.
Following on from a previous question in which I asked: How can I use
Following up from my previous question. Can anyone explain why the following code compiles
Following on from a previous question, ( Previous question ), I can't seem to
I'm following on from a previous question . The answer I accepted involves using
Following on from my previous question , is it possible to make a Python
Following up from my previous question , why is CShell so different from C?
Following on from a previous question, for some reason when I use the following
Following on from a previous question relating to heap usage restrictions , I'm looking
Okay, this is following on from my previous question reguarding performing a simple ajax

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.