Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 195213
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T16:39:42+00:00 2026-05-11T16:39:42+00:00

Following up from my previous question. Can anyone explain why the following code compiles

  • 0

Following up from my previous question.

Can anyone explain why the following code compiles without any errors:

typedef array<VdbMethodInfo^> MethodArray;
typedef array<VdbParameterInfo^> ParameterArray;
ParameterArray^ parameters = gcnew ParameterArray {
    gcnew VdbParameterInfo("name", "string", "Paul")};
MethodArray^ methods = gcnew MethodArray {
    gcnew VdbMethodInfo("createTable", parameters)
};

Yet this gives me “error C2440: ‘initializing’ : cannot convert from ‘VdbParameterInfo ^’ to ‘VdbMethodInfo ^”

typedef array<VdbMethodInfo^> MethodArray;
typedef array<VdbParameterInfo^> ParameterArray;
MethodArray^ methods = gcnew MethodArray {
    gcnew VdbMethodInfo("createTable", gcnew ParameterArray {
        gcnew VdbParameterInfo("name", "string", "Paul")};
    )
};

All I’ve done is attempt to “nest” the parameter array inside the method array initialization… Not directly mind – VdbMethodInfo’s constructor takes, as a second argument, a ParameterArray.

It seems to imply that managed C++ array initialization expects any recursive nesting to have the same type… (i.e. I think this must be a bug)

Related question : here

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T16:39:42+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 4:39 pm

    I’ve found a workaround which makes the syntax cleaner anyway. I use the “…” syntax (Managed C++ equivalent to the C# “params” keyword”):

    public ref class MetaData
    {
        typedef array<VdbMethodInfo^> MethodArray;
        typedef array<VdbParameterInfo^> ParameterArray;
        static ParameterArray^ params(... ParameterArray^ p)
        {
            return p;
        }
    public:
        static array<VdbMethodInfo^>^ Instance()
        {
            ParameterArray^ parameters = gcnew ParameterArray { gcnew VdbParameterInfo("name", "string", "Paul")};
            MethodArray^ methods = gcnew MethodArray {
                gcnew VdbMethodInfo("createTable",
                    params(gcnew VdbParameterInfo("name", "string", "Paul"),
                           gcnew VdbParameterInfo("age", "number", "25")))
            };
    
            return methods;
        }
    };
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Following on from this question I now have code that can attach to a
Following on from my previous question , is it possible to make a Python
Following on from my previous question [link text][1] , I have a new problem.
Following up from this question: How can I unlock a file that is locked
This problem follows on from a previous question . When I run the following
Following on from my previous question, If I am beginning to learn asp.net MVC,
Following on from my recent question on Large, Complex Objects as a Web Service
Following on from this question what would be the best way to write a
Following on from the question asked by Mykroft Best way to handle input from
Following on from this question , I now want to know how to stop

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.