Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8442193
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 10, 20262026-06-10T08:47:04+00:00 2026-06-10T08:47:04+00:00

foo ||= [] foo << :element Feels a little clunky. Is there a more

  • 0
foo ||= []
foo << :element

Feels a little clunky. Is there a more idiomatic way?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-10T08:47:06+00:00Added an answer on June 10, 2026 at 8:47 am
    (foo ||= []) << :element
    

    But meh. Is it really so onerous to keep it readable?

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Where keys are represented by element type and values are represented by #foo and
Given an XML element in jQuery like so: $('<foo oy=vey foo=bar here=is another=attribute />')
I show us the code: (function (){ var element = document.getElementById('bar'), hideElement = document.getElementById('foo'),
I've a XML structure like this: <root> <element> <name>Foo</name> <subelement> <key>1.1</key> <value>Lorem ipsum</value> </subelement>
I'm trying to make a little custom vector... element class, should point to the
Suppose I have some schema: <xsd:schema ...> <xsd:element name=foo> <xsd:complexType> <xsd:sequence> <xsd:element name=fooElement type=xs:string
I'd like to bind the width of a first element (foo) to the width
<xsl:template match=foo> matches the foo element in the null namespace. <xsl:template match=*> matches any
I want to move certain element from a to b: boost::ptr_vector<Foo> a, b; //
I feel like there must be a much better way of expressing the following

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.