Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8924679
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 15, 20262026-06-15T07:29:01+00:00 2026-06-15T07:29:01+00:00

Foo looks has this in it : @ManyToMany private Set<User> favouritedBy; while user has

  • 0

Foo looks has this in it :

@ManyToMany
private Set<User> favouritedBy;

while user has this:

@ManyToMany(mappedBy = "favouritedBy")
private Set<Foo> favourites  = new HashSet<Foo>();
public Set<Foo> getFavourites() {
  return favourite;
}

And fooService has this, with the lazyloaded collection being accessed while session is opened, via the tranactional method :

@Transactional(readOnly = true)
public Set<Foo> getFavourites(User user) {
user = dao.get(User.class, user.getId()); //the dao gets a session
Set<Foo> favourites = user.getFavourites();//but the session is not here and the exception is thrown?
return  favourties;
}

EDIT
This fixes it, without using criteria :

Set<Foo> favourites = new HashSet<Foo>(user.getFavourites());

and this fixes it with criteria

Session session = sessionFactory.getCurrentSession();
final Criteria crit = session.createCriteria(Foo.class);
crit.setFetchMode("favourites", FetchMode.JOIN);
crit.add(Property.forName("id").eq(id));
return (Foo) crit.uniqueResult();
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-15T07:29:02+00:00Added an answer on June 15, 2026 at 7:29 am

    The default FetchType in a ManyToMany is LAZY and the hibernate documentation for working with lazy associations clearly calls out this kind of access as an error. You can interact with lazily associated objects only while the session is still open. That portion of the documentation also provides alternatives to access such lazily associated members of an object . We prefer to specify the fetch mode as JOIN in the criteria used, in our applications

    Edit:

    Set<Foo> favourites = user.getFavourites();
    

    The above statement doesn’t actually return a set that contains all the Foo objects. It is just a proxy. The actual Foo objects are fetched only when the elements in the set are accessed like favorites.iterator() etc., This operation is clearly happening outside your getFavorites() method. But the @Transactional annotation on the getFavorites() method indicates that the session will be closed at the end of this method.

    So, when methods are called on the favourites set, the session is already closed and hence the exception.

    To address this, you should use a Criteria object to retrieve the user and specify the fetch type as JOIN so that the Foo objects are populated in the User object returned.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

My code currently looks like this: private Foo myFoo; public Foo CurrentFoo { get
Given an IList<Foo> with a data set that looks like this: ID CHILD PARENT
I have some code that looks like this: public function foo(Bar $bar) { if
I have code that looks like this: obj.foo(); // obj might, or might not
I have a data that looks like this: foo foo scaffold_7 1 4845 6422
I have a repository that looks something like this: foo/ subrepo/ a_file_in_subrepo another.ext unrelated_file
I have a Rack application that looks like this: class Foo def initialize(app) @app
A normal UserControl looks like this in XAML: <UserControl x:Class=mynamespace.foo ...namespaces...> <!-- content -->
I have a constexpr function that looks something like this: constexpr int foo(int bar)
In a template function that looks like this: template<typename T> constexpr T foo(T a,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.