Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 248271
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T21:19:44+00:00 2026-05-11T21:19:44+00:00

For a library, I need to store the first primes numbers up to a

  • 0

For a library, I need to store the first primes numbers up to a limit L. This collection must have a O(1) lookup time (to check whether a number is prime or not) and it must be easy, given a number, to find the next prime number (assuming it is smaller than L).

Given that L is fixed, an Eratostene sieve to generate the list is fine. Right now, I use a packed boolean array to store the list, which contains only entries for odd numbers between 3 and L (inclusive). This takes (L-2)/2 bits of memory. I would like to be able to statically increase L without using more memory.

Is there a data structure using less memory with similar properties? Or with at least the constant lookup time? (odd numbers can then be enumerated until we get a prime)

(the language I wrote this in is Factor but this question would be the same in any language which has built-in or easily programmable packed bit arrays)

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T21:19:45+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 9:19 pm

    You can explicitly check more prime numbers to remove redundancy.

    At the moment you do this only for two, by checking for divisibility by two explicitly and then storing only for odd numbers whether they are prime.

    For 2 and 3 you get remainders 0 to 5, of which only 1 and 5 are not divisible by two or three and can lead to a prime number, so you are down to 1/3.

    For 2, 3, and 5 you get 8 numbers out of 30, which is nice to store in a byte.

    This is explained in more detail here.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm getting some objects from an external library and I need to store those
I have a collection of worker classes, and I need to be able to
I need a library that allows me to do email operations(e.g Sent/Receive mail) in
I need a library that can detect objects in an image (uses edge detection).
As part of a numerical library test I need to choose base 10 decimal
I need a JavaScript library that supports Ajax as well as help me in
i need a C# library about strict HTML validation and filtering
I need a serialization library for .net with better features than the default xml
I need to build a C++ library to distribute among our customers. The library
I need to use the current library name explicitly in a CL program. CHGVAR

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.