Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 37749
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T14:35:58+00:00 2026-05-10T14:35:58+00:00

For a situation like capturing text incrementally, for example if you were receiving all

  • 0

For a situation like capturing text incrementally, for example if you were receiving all of the output.write calls when a page was rendering, and those were being appended into a textwriter over a stringbuilder.

Is there a more efficient way to do this? Something that exists in dotnet already preferably? Especially if there’s a total size over a hundred k. Maybe something more like an array of pages rather than contiguous memory?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T14:35:58+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 2:35 pm

    I think StringBuilder is the most efficient way to append text in .net. To be more efficient you can specify the initial size of the StringBuilder when you create it.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

The topic generically says it all. Basically in a situation like this: boost::scoped_array<int> p(new
The situation is like this : Main project A. and a class library B.
The situation is somewhat like- var someVar = some_other_function(); someObj.addEventListener(click, function(){ some_function(someVar); }, false);
In a situation where you have something like a Lite, Normal, Ultimate tiers and
I know a question like this was already asked, but the situation is a
I have a problem that seems like its a result of a deadlock-situation. Whe
Situation looks like this: We have product 'A123' and we have to remember lowest
I've a situation like this: class MyClass { private: std::auto_ptr<MyOtherClass> obj; public: MyClass() {
i have situation like this: class IData { virtual void get() = 0; virtual
I've got a situation like this: Table: FunTable ItemKey ItemName ItemPriceEffectiveDate ItemPrice 11 ItemA

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.