Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 750923
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T14:36:25+00:00 2026-05-14T14:36:25+00:00

For ASP.NET MVC extranet applications, what are the pros and cons of using SQL

  • 0

For ASP.NET MVC extranet applications, what are the pros and cons of using SQL Authentication instead of the ASP.NET Membership API to handle security?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T14:36:25+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 2:36 pm

    Gern, you are describing aspects of the same framework.

    The asp.net provider stack is an abstract service layer that ‘provides’ common services to your applications.

    The built in Sql providers are simply implementations that use Sql server as a backing store. The MVC framework and scaffolding provide all of the necessary adapters for using the default Sql providers.

    If the built-in asp.net sql providers provide the functionality you require then the pro is that all the work is done.

    Not sure what a con would be.

    In regards to the possibility that you want to compare using Sql providers vs AD providers:

    The AD/Token based providers Active Directory for authentication and access control and the implication is that a user must have a valid account setup in the AD in order to access protected resources.

    The Sql providers allow you to define arbitrary users that do not require AD accounts.

    The infamous grey zone appears when you have a large AD user base that you must support but must also allow for non-AD accounts to be established. At that point you will start to explore the exquisite joy that building composite provider stacks will bring to your life while it steals your sleep. But that is a topic for another book.

    HTH

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Using ASP.NET MVC there are situations (such as form submission) that may require a
With ASP.NET MVC (or using HttpHandlers) you can dynamically generate URLs, like the one
ASP.NET MVC has been discussed on this forum a few times. I'm about to
ASP.NET MVC routes have names when mapped: routes.MapRoute( Debug, // Route name -- how
ASP.NET MVC - what is this in VB.NET? Html.TextBox( name, null, new { @class
In ASP.NET MVC it's possible to choice between having a typed view were you
My ASP.NET MVC application will take a lot of bandwidth and storage space. How
In ASP.NET MVC is there an equivalent of the Html.ActionLink helper for Img tags?
Although ASP.NET MVC seems to have all the hype these days, WebForms are still
In ASP.NET MVC, we're required to use the suffix Controller for all controllers. This

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.