Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7177495
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 28, 20262026-05-28T16:43:34+00:00 2026-05-28T16:43:34+00:00

For deleting a node which holds obj and is found in the middle of

  • 0

For deleting a node which holds obj and is found in the middle of a linked list I did:

traverser -> next() -> retrieve()) == obj

where

  1. Single_node<Type>* traverser = head(); initially.
  2. retrieve() returns the obj stores inside a Single_node
  3. next() returns the next pointer in a Single_node

This is giving a bad access error on the retrieve()

I don’t understand why..?
Are we not allowed to do ” xxxxx -> bbbbb -> zzzzz ” sort of thing?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-28T16:43:35+00:00Added an answer on May 28, 2026 at 4:43 pm

    You can do certainly do it, except when you are pointing at the last element of the list: in this case, next() would return NULL, and you would see bad access as the result.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

My problem is deleting a node from linked list. I have two structs :
Why is the following snippet for deleting a node in a linked list not
I have a problem about deleting the last node of my linked list. I
Is this the right way of deleting the tail from the linked list in
Which XML structure allows me faster adding,deleting,updating of a node? My assumption is the
I have a script which contains two classes. (I'm obviously deleting a lot of
I'm trying to delete whole linked list but getting segmentation fault and not able
I have made my own single chained/linked list. Now, if I want to delete/remove
I'm studying C++ on my own time, and writing a linked list to try
I have been searching concurrent linked list implementations/academic papers that allow for concurrent insertions

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.