Question

For example for such statement:

c += 2, c -= 1

Is it true that c += 2 will be always evaluated first, and c in second expression c-= 1 will always be updated value from expression c += 2?

Answer 1

Yes, it is guaranteed by the standard, as long as that comma is a non-overloaded comma operator. Quoting n3290 §5.18:

The comma operator groups left-to-right.

expression:
assignment-expression
expression , assignment-expression

A pair of expressions separated by a comma is evaluated left-to-right; the left expression is a discarded-
value expression (Clause 5)⁸³. Every value computation and side effect associated with the left expression
is sequenced before every value computation and side effect associated with the right expression. The type
and value of the result are the type and value of the right operand; the result is of the same value category
as its right operand, and is a bit-field if its right operand is a glvalue and a bit-field.

And the corresponding footnote:

⁸³ However, an invocation of an overloaded comma operator is an ordinary function call; hence, the evaluations of its argument
expressions are unsequenced relative to one another (see 1.9).

So this holds only for the non-overloaded comma operator.

The , between arguments to a function are not comma operators. This rule does not apply there either.

For C++03, the situation is similar:

The comma operator groups left-to-right.

expression:
assignment-expression
expression , assignment-expression

A pair of expressions separated by a comma is evaluated left-to-right and the value of the left expression is
discarded. The lvalue-to-rvalue (4.1), array-to-pointer (4.2), and function-to-pointer (4.3) standard conver-
sions are not applied to the left expression. All side effects (1.9) of the left expression, except for the
destruction of temporaries (12.2), are performed before the evaluation of the right expression. The type and
value of the result are the type and value of the right operand; the result is an lvalue if its right operand is.

Restrictions are the same though: does not apply to overloaded comma operators, or function argument lists.