Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 820841
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T02:32:36+00:00 2026-05-15T02:32:36+00:00

For example I have interface ICommand {} class MovePiece : ICommand {} class Successful<CMD>

  • 0

For example I have

interface ICommand {}
class MovePiece : ICommand {}
class Successful<CMD> where CMD : ICommand {}

and I want the following:

CovariantlyEqual(
  typeof(Successful<ICommand>), 
  typeof(Successful<MovePiece>))
.ShouldEqualTrue()

Update
Eric asks below why I would want to test such a thing. Fair enough. I think there are many occasions where the ability to check this “equality” easily would be useful. Take a simple event aggregator as an example – you want to be able to tell it that you are interested to subscribing to all successful commands. Meanwhile another component can be interested in only a successful MovePiece event.

I guess I am wrong but I thought this was what co and contra variance was all about. Maybe equality is the wrong term here, but clearly there is some sort of relationship between the type definition Successful<MovePiece> and Successful<ICommmand> is there nothing in the language that exposes it easily?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T02:32:36+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 2:32 am

    First of all, even if such a method did exist, in your case it should not equal true for two reasons: (in fact, if you do Success<ICommand> c = new Success<MovePiece>() it wouldn’t even compile.)

    1. Only generic delegates or generic interfaces can be marked as variant, not classes
    2. You need to explicitly mark it with either in or out parameters.

    Having said that, here’s a small modification:

    interface ICommand { }
    class MovePiece : ICommand { }
    interface ISuccessful<out CMD> where CMD : ICommand { }
    class Implementation<CMD> : ISuccessful<CMD> where CMD : ICommand { }
    

    Once you have that in place, you can use the IsAssignableFrom() method on Type:

    bool b = typeof(ISuccessful<ICommand>).IsAssignableFrom(typeof(Implementation<MovePiece>));
    Console.WriteLine(b);
    

    This will output true.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have an interface public interface IResolver<T> { T Resolve(); } I know this
I have an interface pretty much identical to one located in the ExtJS examples
I have an issue where I have an interface that has parts that make
Using Entity Framework 4 I want to create a base interface for my objects
Look at the specification of the ReadOnlyCollection class, it does implements the IList interface,
I have a requirment to have communication between two processes using message queues. One
I would to block child classes from overriding a base method and have the
I'm trying to use C++ abstract base class in the way similar with Java
How I should make sure that classes needed as a one of params to
I am confused about how to access the attributes of an ActiveRecord instance from

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.