Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7086935
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 28, 20262026-05-28T07:36:42+00:00 2026-05-28T07:36:42+00:00

For example I wanted to do the following: namespace Test { static bool PerformTest()

  • 0

For example I wanted to do the following:

namespace Test
{
    static bool PerformTest()
    {
        bool result = false;

        // Todo: do something

        return result;
    }
}

..and then call that function from another module:

Test::PerformTest();

..I get an error saying that PerformTest is not part of the namespace. If it were a class I’d put this down to a missing ‘public’ statement but as far as I can tell you can only make ref classes and structs public?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-28T07:36:43+00:00Added an answer on May 28, 2026 at 7:36 am
    static bool PerformTest()
    

    The static keyword means different things in different contexts. Here it means “no external linkage” which it the exact opposite you want. You’ll have to remove it.

    It isn’t clear whether or not /clr is in effect when this code gets compiled. Let’s assume it is. The CLR has no support for free functions like this, it only supports class methods. The C++/CLI compiler deals with this by creating a dummy class named <Module> in the global namespace, making a free function a method of that class that is static and has internal accessibility. Both the class name and the accessibility specifier keeps it well out of reach from a C# program. Reflection should work but I’ve never tried it.

    There is one back-door, you can export a free function just like you can in a native DLL project. Same syntax:

    extern "C" __declspec(dllexport) 
    bool __stdcall PerformTest() { 
        // etc.. 
    }
    

    The C++/CLI compiler exports a stub with the same name as the function that any native code can call. The stub loads the CLR, if required, switches to managed code execution and calls the actual PerformTest() function. Any C# code can now pinvoke the function. The overhead is a bit silly but that should not matter much in a test scenario.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I wanted to generate the following using XmlSerializer : <atom:link href=http://dallas.example.com/rss.xml rel=self type=application/rss+xml />
I saw the following example on Nabble , where the goal was to return
Say I wanted to make the following re-usable: function replace_foo(target, replacement) { return target.replace(string_to_replace,replacement);
I have the following variable in a class named Example: private static int number;
Let's say for example I wanted to echo You are using Windows! or You
I wanted to set .htaccess to rewrite: example.com/bla/info/ to example.com/info/index.php?q=bla example.com/bla/info/txt/ to example.com/info/index.php?q=bla&t=txt I
I wanted to develop one HTTP example on win32 platform, which is asynchronous. I
I wanted to check whether the variable is defined or not. For example, the
As an example, lets say I wanted to list the frequency of each letter
I just wanted to know what's the difference between clear() and str(); For example:

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.