Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9176841
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 17, 20262026-06-17T17:12:00+00:00 2026-06-17T17:12:00+00:00

For example, if I have written a module in F# module Lib type A

  • 0

For example, if I have written a module in F#

module Lib

type A =
    member this.x1 x = ...

let helpa x = ...
let helpb x = ...

type B =
    member this.y1 x = ...

let helpc x = ...

typeA with
    member this.x2 x = ...
typeB with
    member this.y2 x = ...

It works well in F# by open Lib, However, if I want to consume it in C# (where I am only interested in types and member functions in Lib), each time I create a type I have to new Lib.A(...). It becomes rather annoying there is no way to omit the module names. Calling a static method like Lib.A.C() is even more of a hassle.

Then I try to replace module with namespace, each time I introduce some helper functions I have to create a new module with a new name. Occasionally I can manage to rearrange all helper functions into 1 module, but that would result in less readable code somehow.

What would be a better structure for this?

Wish I had: Using * = Lib.* for C#.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-17T17:12:02+00:00Added an answer on June 17, 2026 at 5:12 pm

    I think you already mentioned the best option in your answer – define the file with namespace declaration at the top (this way, you can write just using Lib in C#) and then place all helper functions in modules.

    Helper functions that are clearly associated with some type (e.g. with A) could be placed into a module named A (similarly to F# functions in the List module that are associated with the List<'T> type).

    This is a bit more work, because you need to mark the module with a special attribute (to avoid name clash), but it will be easy to use from both F# and C# (and I think having nice use is more important than saving a few keystrokes when building the library):

    namespace Lib
    
    // Declaration of the 'A' type and helper functions in 'A' module 
    type A() =
      member this.x1 x = 10
    
    [<CompilationRepresentation(CompilationRepresentationFlags.ModuleSuffix)>]
    module A = 
      let helpa (x:A) = x.x1
      let helpb (x:A) = x.x1
    
    // Declaration of the 'B' type and helper functions in 'B' module 
    type B() =
      member this.y1 x = 10
    
    [<CompilationRepresentation(CompilationRepresentationFlags.ModuleSuffix)>]
    module B = 
      let helpc (x:B) = x.y1
    
    // Member augmentations for easy use from C#
    type A with
        member this.x2 x = A.helpa this
    type B with
        member this.y2 x = B.helpc this
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm a beginner with Json, I follow this tutorial the example I have written
I have this example module which I want to initialize without making individual call
I have Python extension module written in C. I want to use in this
I have written a few nearly identical functions, except for their names. For example:
Example: I have a selector like this, which I give to another method as
I've written a program in which I have a fairly typical class. In this
I'm using MVC with /<module>/<controller>/<action>/ have a module at example.com/module/whatever, and I need to
I have written a custom modyle, for example it is printing Hello World to
I have written a Python module which contains functions that return arrays. I want
I am learning Python, and I have written a script per an example in

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.