Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 693373
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T02:44:50+00:00 2026-05-14T02:44:50+00:00

For example, in this simple function where fun1 takes as input two numbers, adds

  • 0

For example, in this simple function where fun1 takes as input two numbers, adds them together and passes them to function 2 for printing the output. var1_in is local to each function, so is it OK to use the name var1_in in both functions, or is it better practice to call them different things?

fun1 <- function (var1_in, var2_in) {
 var3 = var1_in + var2_in
 fun2(var3)
 }

fun2 <- function (var1_in) {
 var4 = var1_in
 print(var4)
 }
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T02:44:50+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 2:44 am

    As long as the functions are short enough to easily understand, then identifying the scope of local variables and parameters will be easy as well. But there isn’t a hard and fast rule for this. What’s important is that the code is easy to understand and that the names of variables are relevant and meaningful regardless if this means name duplication. Modern IDE’s will also help here by highlighting the instances of such variables making it easy to see their declaration and various usage points. Point being, I would focus more on quality and meaningful naming rather than duplication of variable names.

    EDIT – Of course, one situation to avoid would be naming a local variable or parameter the same as a global variable. This can confuse things greatly and lead to many a subtle bug.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I am using this simple example to understand Python's getattr function: In [25]: class
Consider this simple example code: <form name=text id=frm1 method=post> <input type=checkbox name=name[] value=1000> Chk1<br>
...is it possible? For example, can I add this simple function... public static double
I have this simple example code: var request = mozIndexedDB.open('MyTestDatabase'); request.onsuccess = function(event){ var
Consider this simple example (which displays in red): echo -e \033[31mHello World\033[0m It displays
I have this simple example I can't seems to get working : MERGE INTO
This simple example fails to compile in VS2K8: io_service io2; shared_ptr<asio::deadline_timer> dt(make_shared<asio::deadline_timer>(io2, posix_time::seconds(20))); As
Have a look a this simple example. I don't quite understand why o1 prints
I'm working on a bigger project atm, but I made this simple example to
If I try to implement this simple-as-possible example: Update Content with AJAXRefreshRequest it does

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.