Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6213043
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T06:37:31+00:00 2026-05-24T06:37:31+00:00

For example: struct Foo { int bar; int (*baz)(int); }; int testFunc(int x) {

  • 0

For example:

struct Foo
{
    int bar;
    int (*baz)(int);
};

int testFunc(int x)
{
    return x;
}

Foo list[] = {
    { 0, &testFunc },
    { 1, 0 } // no func for this.
};

In this example, I’d rather put the function directly into the list[] initializer rather than using a pointer to a function declared elsewhere; it keeps the related code/data in the same place.

Is there a way of doing this? I tried every syntax I could think of and couldn’t get it to work.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T06:37:32+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 6:37 am

    If you mean something like:

    Foo list[] = {
        { 0, int (*)(int x) { return x;} },
        { 1, 0 } // no func for this.
    };
    

    then, no, it’s not possible. You’re talking about anonymous functions, something C++ doesn’t yet support (as of August 2011).

    C++0x is adding support for lambda functions, which is pretty much the same thing and your syntax would probably be something like:

    Foo list[] = {
        { 0, [](int x) { return x; } },
        { 1, 0                       }
    };
    

    However, if your intention is simply to keep the code and data in close proximity, then just keep them in close proximity (the same C source file, with the code immediately preceding the data).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have some null struct, for example: struct null_type { null_type& someNonVirtualMethod() { return
Taking the following snippet as an example: struct Foo { typedef int type; };
If I have structure definitions, for example, like these: struct Base { int foo;
This outputs F~ but I was expecting ~F #include <iostream> struct Foo { int
I need to call a const function from a non-const object. See example struct
For example, I have a struct which is something like this: struct Test {
Here is an (artificial) example of using a function that returns an anonymous struct
Consider following example. #include <iostream> #include <algorithm> #include <vector> #include <boost/bind.hpp> void func(int e,
I have some function templates, for example template <typename T> void foo(T); template <typename
I'm having trouble understanding the value of this in the following example: struct A

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.