Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8023543
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 4, 20262026-06-04T22:35:29+00:00 2026-06-04T22:35:29+00:00

For example the javascript code is: function a() { this.Foo = function() {//…} }

  • 0

For example the javascript code is:

function a() {  
    this.Foo = function() {//...}
}  

What I usually do is that I create a global reference:

_a = new a();

Then use it wherever I want in body or other script area:

_a.Foo()

Is this good or bad practice? or is there a better/more professional way to do that?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-04T22:35:31+00:00Added an answer on June 4, 2026 at 10:35 pm

    In general Javascript developers try to avoid this, because of the possibility of different libraries conflicting with each other in the global scope. To avoid this, consider (if possible) using what’s called a closure to create a private scope for your variable. That looks like this:

    (function() {
        _a = new a();
    })();
    

    Everything declared inside the inner function is invisible to code outside it.

    If you can’t use a closure for whatever reason, then an alternative would be to create a “namespace” for your variables.

    var MyCompany = { };
    MyCompany.MyLibrary = { };
    MyCompany.MyLibrary._a = new a();
    

    This way you are able to restrict your code to acquiring a single global name (MyCompany), with other variables and methods residing inside that namespace.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I've seen a few JavaScript code examples that use this sort of syntax: function(foo:String)
Consider this example Javascript code: a = new Array(); a['a1']='foo'; a['a2']='bar'; b = new
I do know that in javascript, when you use this keyword inside a function,
I've simplified my JavaScript code to the example below; this code is giving me
I'm trying to modify this example http://storelocator.googlecode.com/git/examples/panel.html the javascript code is here: https://gist.github.com/2725336 the
sometimes i use debug code to alert something in javascript (for example, matching something
For example in javascript var image = new Image(); image.onerror = function(e) { //
I have an index.php file that loads other php files via this javascript/ajax code:
I have code that looks like this: obj.foo(); // obj might, or might not
I have seen Javascript code that uses parenthesis immediately after a function's closing curly

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.