Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6596843
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T18:07:47+00:00 2026-05-25T18:07:47+00:00

For example, we have a durable topic consumer and some broker for that topic.

  • 0

For example, we have a durable topic consumer and some broker for that topic. As far as I understand that broker will continue to store every message (within some limits) even if that durable consumer is not active for a very long time.

Is there some broker’s policy in ActiveMQ to destroy (auto unsubscribe) inactive (for some specified time) durable consumers? So that I don’t need to monitor if all consumers still valid and actually exist.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T18:07:47+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 6:07 pm

    I would suggest you to use virtual topics instead of durable consumers.

    When using virtual topic all your messages from producer are sent the same way you send them now. However when a new consumer registers with a unique consumer name – a new queue is created for him, and all messages sent to virtual topic are duplicated into the queue. That means each consumer has his own queue – which is much more convenient than durable topic subscription.

    Then when you know for sure your consumer no longer exists – you can delete the queue with all pending messages in it. It can be done whether from code or manually through AMQ web console or jconsole.

    EDIT:
    With virtual topic you get a new queue for every single consumer, therefore you can apply queue policy to delete it when inactive for a specified period of time.

    In your activemq.xml set gcInactiveDestinations=true:

     <destinationPolicy>
            <policyMap>
              <policyEntries>
                 <policyEntry queue=">" producerFlowControl="false" 
                          gcInactiveDestinations="true" inactiveTimoutBeforeGC="10000"/>
    

    Read more:
    http://activemq.apache.org/delete-inactive-destinations.html

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a task that has a durable subscriber on a JMS topic and
is there a way to for example have checkboxes that store their variable to
If I for example have <p> some long text </p> on my HTML page,
Example: I have an class that inherits from UIImageView. An object creates an instance
Example: I have an NSInteger and I wrap that into an NSNumber object. Now
Example: I have an variable like $method = doSomething; Assume that I have an
We have a hub-and-spoke network topology with activemq with topic and durable subscribers. After
Let's say I for example have this class that generates Fibonacci numbers: public class
Why does: const char example; (uint64*)example have a value of 140734799798420 and *(uint64*)example have
I'm using the Silverlight UnitTest framerwork does anyone have a good example have how

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.