Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8804821
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 14, 20262026-06-14T01:42:19+00:00 2026-06-14T01:42:19+00:00

For implementation of onClick function which approach is better? Saving touch start / touch

  • 0

For implementation of onClick function which approach is better?

  1. Saving touch start / touch up coordinates and processing this values for closeness? Like, if starting point and up point close each other, let the click action start.
  2. Saving touch start / touch up time difference and processing this value? Like, if touch starting time and up time difference less than a value, let the click action start.

And why?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-14T01:42:21+00:00Added an answer on June 14, 2026 at 1:42 am

    Depends on how many kind of touch events you want to support:

    1. on Up : click

    2. on Up : without moving much – > click , moved -> swipe

    3. on Up : short duration – > click , long duration -> long press has
      been triggered, ignore.

    4. on Up and long press triggered : without moving much – > ignore , moved -> drag n drop

    You go into details of duration and displacement , when you really need more kinds of touch events.Best approach depends on scenario. So, if your touchscreen doesn’t have a notion of swipe or long press or drag n drop, you might just fire a click on every up event, simplest scenario.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a little javascript function which is attached to an onClick event of
When an event handler function gets registered like this: element.onload = function() { var
I have a Control that looks like this: <telerik:RadCodeBlock runat=server> <script type=text/javascript> function refresh()
The implementation of Enumerable.AsEnumerable<T>(this IEnumerable<T> source) simply returns source . However Observable.AsObservable<T>(this IObservable<T> source)
In the tableView:cellForRowAtIndexPath: implementation of my UITableViewController subclass I'm using this code snippet: AlarmPicker
Is there a better way than the implementation I have now? I'm concerned that
This is a simple implementation of the ViewHolder pattern. I have a cursor containing
The implementation of a std::allocator (based on MAllocator ) backed by Windows named shared
My implementation of Sieve of Atkin either overlooks primes near the limit or composites
My implementation of QTabWidget is not detecting its tabCloseRequested() and currentChanged() signals. TileSheetManager::TileSheetManager(QWidget *parent)

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.