Home/ Questions/Q 48749
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-05-10T16:19:43+00:00

For intense number-crunching i’m considering using fixed point instead of floating point. Of course

  • 0

For intense number-crunching i’m considering using fixed point instead of floating point. Of course it’ll matter how many bytes the fixed point type is in size, on what CPU it’ll be running on, if i can use (for Intel) the MMX or SSE or whatever new things come up…

I’m wondering if these days when floating point runs faster than ever, is it ever worth considering fixed point? Are there general rules of thumb where we can say it’ll matter by more than a few percent? What is the overview from 35,000 feet of numerical performance? (BTW, i’m assuming a general CPU as found in most computers, not DSP or specialized embedded systems.)

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. It’s still worth it. Floating point is faster than in the past, but fixed-point is also. And fixed is still the only way to go if you care about precision beyond that guaranteed by IEEE 754.

    • 0