Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8974883
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 15, 20262026-06-15T18:45:35+00:00 2026-06-15T18:45:35+00:00

For large problems sizes, an algorithm with time cost O(2^n) is faster than an

  • 0

For large problems sizes, an algorithm with time cost O(2^n) is faster than an algorithm
that has time cost O(N^2)

Is this true or false?

What I think is that if C^n, C = constant and C > 1, then it will grow faster than
O(N^2). Is this correct?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-15T18:45:36+00:00Added an answer on June 15, 2026 at 6:45 pm

    For large problems sizes, an algorithm with time cost O(2n) is faster than an algorithm that has time cost O(n2).

    FALSE, because 2n > n2 for n > 4, and greater means slower.

    For C = constant and C > 1, Cn grows faster than O(n2).

    TRUE.

    Here is a Wolfram|Alpha reference.

    enter image description here

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I am having problems with the emulator crashing when drawing a large image. The
I am using matplotlib and I'm finding some problems when trying to plot large
I have a large project that executes without problem when not debugging (even when
My specific problem is that I need to execute a (potentially) large number of
In my free time I like polishing my algorithm / programming skills (well, my
I have an algorithm which currently allocates a very large array of doubles, which
Imagine that you have a large set of #m objects with properties A and
I'm working in a C/C++ mixed project that has the following situation. I need
This is a design/algorithm question. Here's the outline of my scenario: I have a
I have folders containing large numbers of files (e.g. 1000+) of various sizes which

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.