For my tests I’m using a base class MyTestBase defining a method setup() that does some base preparations:
public class MyTestBase {
@Configuration( beforeTestMethod=true )
protected void setup() {
// do base preparations
}
}
Now I have some more specific test classes that have to do their own preparations. There are different ways how to implement this.
I could use @Override:
public class MySpecialTestBase extends MyTestBase {
@Override
protected void setup() {
super.setup();
// do additional preparations
}
}
…or I could use a separate setup method:
public class MySpecialTestBase extends MyTestBase {
@Configuration( beforeTestMethod=true )
protected void setupSpecial() {
// do additional preparations
}
}
Is there a prefered way to implement this?
I would prefer using
@Configurationannotation.@Overrideandsuperare more fragile. You can forget to callsuper.setup(), or call it in wrong place. Meanwhile, using separate method with@Configurationlets you to choose more appropriate naming for child setup method if necessary, and you get setup order guaranteed by TestNG (parent then child).Two more points:
finalin order to forbid accidental overriding.@BeforeMethodannotations. They are available since TestNG 5.0. Of course, for older versions you forced to using@Configuration.