Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 994005
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T06:30:51+00:00 2026-05-16T06:30:51+00:00

For one reason or another, I sometimes find it useful or just interesting to

  • 0

For one reason or another, I sometimes find it useful or just interesting to look at the optimised compiler output for a function.

For unmanaged C/C++ code, my favourite way to do this has been to compile in Release mode, stick a breakpoint in the function of interest, run, and view the disassembly in Visual Studio when it hits the breakpoint.

I recently tried this with a C# project and discovered that that technique doesn’t work. Even in Release mode, the disassembly I see is obviously not optimised. I found and disabled (in Visual Studio 2010) the “Debug … Options and Settings … Debugging … General … Suppress JIT optimization on module load” option, which presumeably gets me closer to what I want, only now it warns me when I try to run it, and I then can’t get it to stop on a breakpoint so that I can see the disassembly.

So, if I want to see the disassembled, optimised output of the CLR (4.0) jitter for a function, what’s the best way to go about that? To be clear, I’d like to see the x86 (or preferably x86_64) disassembly, not just the IL disassembly (which you can see in Reflector).

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T06:30:52+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 6:30 am

    Of course, after half a day of searching for the answer on this one, I find the answer myself 5 minutes after I ask on SO.

    I was close; the only missing step from what I had in the question was that "Enable Just My Code" must also be unchecked in the options.

    The full guide is available here: <Link>

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

For one reason or another I had to empty folder in my subversion repository
I have some classes that, for one reason or another, cannot be or need
For one reason or another we need to create a custom 32-bit build of
For one reason or another, I'm forced to provide both a copy constructor and
For one reason or another, I have a few nasty JSON files in my
For one reason or another, we need to run our JSF2 application on a
That's the question. Give only one reason you think why have OODB failed or
For some reason one installation of Moodle 1.9.3+ has a problem that file.php returns
For some reason I need to cast/convert a DateTime into one of many custom
Is there any particular reason to use one over the other? I personally tend

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.