Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3980688
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 20, 20262026-05-20T05:19:15+00:00 2026-05-20T05:19:15+00:00

For reasons that I won’t get into here, I will be doing some new

  • 0

For reasons that I won’t get into here, I will be doing some new development a Windows 2000 Server with a SQL Server 7 database. The existing website housed on this box is running Classic ASP and I will be developing some new capabilities that I was hoping to develop in ASP.NET, preferably MVC, so .NET 3.5 would be what I am shooting for.

Is it possible to setup .NET 3.5 on a Win 2K server?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-20T05:19:15+00:00Added an answer on May 20, 2026 at 5:19 am

    I don’t think .net 3.5 is supported on W2K.

    Source: msdn

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

For various reasons that I won't go into (I promise it's necessary to do
From reasons I won't get into, all our unit tests are using the VSTS
For reasons I won't get into I'm forced to configure a log4j appender programmatically.
For reasons that only the developers can understand, Firefox will create and open .url
Here is a JSFiddle that demonstrates the problem... http://jsfiddle.net/L2NBP/5/ For obvious reasons this code
Basically I'm trying to proxy some web services locally (for reasons I won't go
For silly reasons I'll not go into here, I need the commented out line
I have a bash script that, for reasons I won't discuss, cannot be made
I'm using pthreads that don't allocate any local variables. For reasons I won't go
For reasons that we won't discuss, I have determined that MAMP is a pile

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.